Motorola Moto G31 vs Samsung Galaxy A13: The Ultimate Budget Showdown

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola Moto G31 and Samsung Galaxy A13 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A13 edges out the Moto G31 thanks to its brighter display, faster charging, and generally smoother performance. While the Moto G31 offers a slightly more powerful chipset on paper, the A13's optimizations and overall package make it the better value.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto G31 Samsung Galaxy A13
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/150 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2021, November 182022, March 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, December 06Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions161.9 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight181 g (6.38 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
 Water-repellent design-
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLEDPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G52
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 12Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single-8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging10W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMineral Grey, Baby BlueBlack, White, Peach, Blue
ModelsXT2173-3SM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N
PriceAbout 120 EUR€ 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00
SAR-0.49 W/kg (head)
SAR EU-0.37 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 114h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -29.7 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9) GeekBench: 588 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola Moto G31

  • Slightly more powerful chipset (on paper)
  • Near-stock Android experience
  • Decent display

  • Dimmer display
  • Slower charging (10W)
  • Camera can be inconsistent

Samsung Galaxy A13

  • Brighter display
  • Faster charging (15W)
  • Smoother performance (due to optimizations)
  • Reliable Samsung ecosystem

  • Chipset not as powerful on paper
  • Samsung's One UI can be divisive

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A13 boasts a significant advantage with its measured 587 nits max brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. The 1324:1 contrast ratio is excellent on both, but the A13's brightness elevates the viewing experience. The Moto G31's display is adequate but noticeably dimmer.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer decent camera systems for their price range. The Galaxy A13 generally produces more consistent and pleasing images, particularly in well-lit conditions. The Moto G31's camera can sometimes struggle with dynamic range and color accuracy. Video recording quality is similar on both.

Performance

The Moto G31's Helio G85 chipset has a theoretical edge with its dual Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Exynos 850 in the Galaxy A13 benefits from Samsung's software optimizations, often resulting in smoother day-to-day performance and better efficiency. Gaming performance is comparable, but the A13's stability might be slightly better.

Battery Life

Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (114h), indicating excellent battery life. Real-world usage will likely yield a full day of moderate use on either device. The Galaxy A13's 15W charging is faster than the Moto G31's 10W, reducing charging times.

Buying Guide

The Motorola Moto G31 is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful processor for gaming and those who prefer a near-stock Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a better choice for those who value a brighter, more vibrant display, faster charging, and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
While the Moto G31 has a slightly more powerful chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A13's optimizations often lead to a smoother and more stable gaming experience.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A13 worth the extra money?
Generally, yes. The brighter display, faster charging, and smoother performance make it a more well-rounded package, justifying the slight price difference.