The Motorola Moto G24 and Samsung Galaxy A14 represent compelling options in the ultra-competitive sub-$200 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The key differentiator lies in their chipset options, with Samsung offering a version powered by their in-house Exynos 850 alongside the Mediatek Helio G80, while the Moto G24 sticks with the Mediatek Helio G85. This comparison will dissect these differences and determine which phone provides the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G24 offers a slightly better balance of performance and value. While the Samsung Galaxy A14’s Exynos variant holds potential, the consistent Helio G85 performance in the G24, coupled with a potentially lower price, makes it the more reliable choice for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 18 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 06 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 537 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Charcoal, Ice Green, Blueberry, Pink Lavender | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | XT2423-1 | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | £ 74.99 / € 101.62 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G24
- Consistent performance with Helio G85
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Mediatek chipset
- Likely basic display quality
- 15W charging is relatively slow
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Potential for better performance with Exynos 850 (version dependent)
- Samsung’s One UI software experience
- Strong brand recognition
- Helio G80 version offers limited performance gains
- Exynos 850 version may be harder to find and more expensive
- 15W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are unavailable, the focus here is on functionality rather than visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, and neither supports high refresh rates. The display experience will likely be similar, prioritizing visibility over immersive quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance will be largely dependent on software processing. Both phones likely feature a primary camera around 50MP, but details on sensor size and aperture are missing. The Moto G24 and A14 both likely include auxiliary cameras, often a 2MP macro and depth sensor, which offer limited utility. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but expect struggles in low light. The Exynos 850 version of the A14 *might* have a slight edge in image processing capabilities, but this is speculative without further data. Focusing on the primary sensor’s quality and software optimization will be crucial for real-world results.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant area of differentiation. The Moto G24’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A14 presents a split: the Helio G80 (12nm) version has 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Exynos 850 (8nm) version uses 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 8nm process of the Exynos 850 *should* offer better power efficiency and potentially sustained performance compared to the 12nm Helio G80. However, the Helio G85 in the Moto G24 offers a slight clock speed advantage over the G80, and its architecture is closer to the Exynos 850 in terms of core configuration. This suggests the G24 will likely provide smoother multitasking and gaming than the Helio G80 A14 variant. The Exynos 850 version of the A14 is the wildcard, potentially offering a more noticeable performance boost, but availability and pricing are key factors.
Battery Life
Both the Moto G24 and Samsung Galaxy A14 feature 15W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. Battery capacity is not specified, but both are likely to be in the 5000mAh range, common for this price point. The Exynos 850’s 8nm process *could* translate to slightly better battery life in the A14, but the difference will likely be marginal. Expect all-day battery life with moderate usage on both devices. The 15W charging will require approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G24 if you prioritize consistent performance in a budget device and want a phone that’s likely to be readily available at a competitive price. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you specifically seek the potential benefits of Samsung’s Exynos 850 chipset – particularly if you find a version with it at a similar price – and value Samsung’s One UI software experience and brand reputation. Be aware that the A14 has a variant with the older Helio G80.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 chip in the Galaxy A14 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 850 is generally efficient, sustained gaming on the Galaxy A14 could lead to some thermal throttling. The 8nm process helps mitigate this, but the phone's plastic build and limited cooling solutions mean it won't maintain peak performance indefinitely. Expect some frame rate drops after extended play.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, the 2MP macro cameras on both the Moto G24 and Galaxy A14 are largely marketing features. The low resolution and lack of autofocus result in images that are often soft, noisy, and lack detail. They are best avoided in favor of using the main camera and digital zoom.
❓ Can the Moto G24 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile at 60fps with medium settings?
The Moto G24’s Helio G85 should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at 60fps with medium graphics settings. However, expect occasional frame drops during intense action sequences. Optimizing in-game settings and closing background apps will help maintain a smoother experience.
❓ Which phone is more likely to receive software updates and security patches?
Samsung generally provides more consistent and longer-term software support than Motorola. The Galaxy A14 is likely to receive more frequent security patches and potentially one or two major Android version updates, while the Moto G24’s update schedule is typically less predictable.
