The Motorola Moto G24 Power and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this, focusing on distinct strengths like battery endurance and display quality. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more vibrant display and smoother overall performance, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is the better choice. However, the Motorola Moto G24 Power’s 30W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day and need quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 30 | 2023, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 07 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 74.5 x 9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 537 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm - International version
16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm - India version | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Ink Blue | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A156B, SM-A156B/DS, SM-A156P, SM-A156P/DS, SM-A156U, SM-A156U1, SM-A156U1/DS, SM-A156W, SM-A156P/N, SM-A156P/DSN, SM-S156VL, SM-A156M, SM-A156E, SM-A156E/DSN |
| Price | € 132.29 | € 167.00 / $ 79.97 / ₹ 17,490 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.46 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G24 Power
- Faster 30W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially longer talk time due to efficient power management
- Competitive price point
- Likely dimmer display compared to the A15 5G
- Older chipset with less processing power
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
- Brighter 786 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- More powerful and efficient Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ chipset
- Excellent 14:31h active use battery life
- Slower 25W charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the Moto G24 Power
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 786 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Moto G24 Power, making the A15 5G far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the G24 Power’s panel specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The A15 5G’s brightness isn’t just about visibility; it contributes to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience for videos and photos. We can assume both use LCD panels at this price point, but the A15 5G’s superior brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market segment, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature primary sensors around the 50MP mark. The A15 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more refined images with better dynamic range. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unlikely on either device at this price point. The usefulness of the often-included 2MP macro cameras on both phones is questionable, offering limited practical benefit over the main sensor.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G24 Power’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm). The Dimensity 6100+ utilizes more efficient Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the G85’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process node further enhances efficiency, reducing heat generation and potentially minimizing performance throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A15 5G’s chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage, particularly for gaming and demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G achieves an impressive 14:31h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery endurance. While the Moto G24 Power’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 30W wired charging is a key differentiator. The A15 5G is limited to 25W charging. This means the G24 Power can replenish its battery faster, even if its overall capacity is slightly lower. For users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost, the G24 Power’s faster charging is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G24 Power if you need a phone that can be rapidly recharged, minimizing downtime between uses, and you prioritize maximizing talk time over demanding applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G if you prefer a brighter, more visually appealing display for media consumption and a slightly more responsive user experience thanks to the more modern chipset, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ in the Galaxy A15 5G get noticeably warm during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 6100+’s 6nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the Helio G85. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the A15 5G is less likely to experience significant throttling or overheating during prolonged use, offering a more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G24 Power from 0% to 100% with the 30W charger?
While a precise figure requires testing, the Moto G24 Power’s 30W charging should deliver a full charge in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 1 hour and 45 minutes, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Galaxy A15 5G’s 25W charging.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on both phones compatible with all 5G carriers?
Both phones support 5G, but compatibility can vary depending on your carrier and region. It's crucial to check with your carrier to ensure the specific 5G bands supported by these phones are compatible with their network. Both devices should support the most common 5G bands, but regional variations exist.
