The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola Moto G23 and Samsung Galaxy A14 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G23 edges out the Galaxy A14 thanks to its faster charging and slightly more powerful chipset. However, Samsung's brand recognition, software support, and potentially better camera processing make it a close call. Ultimately, it depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, AP/MEA | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - AP/MEA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 24 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.3 g (6.49 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | Water-resistant design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Charcoal, Pearl White, Steel Blue | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | XT2333-1 | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 80 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G23
- Faster 30W Charging
- Slightly More Powerful Chipset (Helio G85)
- Clean Android Experience
- Competitive Price
- Potentially Less Refined Camera
- Less Brand Recognition
- Display may not be as vibrant
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Samsung's One UI Software
- Longer Software Support
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Strong Brand Recognition
- Slower 15W Charging
- Chipset Performance Slightly Lower
- Can be more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large 6.6-inch displays, but the Galaxy A14 typically has a slightly better panel with potentially higher brightness and color accuracy. The Moto G23's display is adequate but may not be as vibrant. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 generally boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a higher-resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. While the Moto G23's camera is decent, Samsung's software optimization often results in more pleasing photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Both likely have a 50MP main sensor.
Performance
The Moto G23's Helio G85 chipset offers a slight performance advantage over the Galaxy A14's Helio G80 (Version A) or Exynos 850 (Version B). This translates to smoother multitasking and slightly better gaming performance. However, real-world differences may be minimal.
Battery Life
Both phones pack large 5000mAh batteries, offering excellent all-day battery life. However, the Moto G23's 30W wired charging significantly outperforms the Galaxy A14's 15W charging, allowing for much faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G23 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a bit more processing power for gaming or multitasking. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better choice for those who value Samsung's One UI, longer software support, and a potentially more refined camera experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically receives longer software updates and security patches compared to the Motorola Moto G23.
❓ Is the Moto G23 good for gaming?
The Moto G23's Helio G85 chipset can handle most casual games well, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. The Galaxy A14's performance is slightly less, but still adequate for casual gaming.
