Motorola Moto G23 vs Moto G53: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G53 edges out the G23 thanks to its superior display brightness, more efficient Snapdragon chipset, and 5G connectivity. While the G23 boasts faster charging, the G53’s overall performance and display quality make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G23 | Motorola Moto G53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, AP/MEA | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - AP/MEA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 24 | Available. Released 2022, December 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.3 g (6.49 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Water-resistant design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Charcoal, Pearl White, Steel Blue | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink |
| Models | XT2333-1 | XT2335-2 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G23
- Faster 30W Charging
- Larger Display (potentially)
- Generally more affordable
- Less efficient chipset
- Lower display brightness
- No 5G
Motorola Moto G53
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Snapdragon 480+ 5G Chipset
- Excellent Battery Life
- 5G Connectivity
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging (18W in many regions)
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
The Moto G53 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured 599 nits peak brightness significantly outperforms what we'd expect from the G23, offering better visibility in sunlight. Both boast a high 1746:1 contrast ratio, ensuring deep blacks and vibrant colors. The G53's display also likely benefits from the Snapdragon 480+’s better GPU, potentially leading to smoother scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable between the two, though detailed camera samples would be needed for a definitive judgment. Both phones feature standard camera setups for their price range. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light. The G53 might have a slight edge due to the Snapdragon's image processing capabilities.
Performance
The Snapdragon 480+ in the Moto G53 is generally more efficient and offers better performance than the Helio G85 in the G23. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon chip contributes to improved power efficiency and potentially better thermal management. While both have octa-core CPUs, the Kryo cores in the Snapdragon 480+ are generally considered more powerful per core.
Battery Life
The Moto G53 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the G23's battery capacity is similar, the G53's more efficient chipset likely contributes to its superior longevity. The G23 does offer faster 30W wired charging, which can be a significant advantage for some users.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G23 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly larger screen, who don't need 5G. The Motorola Moto G53 is a better fit for those seeking a brighter, smoother display, improved performance, and future-proof 5G connectivity, even with slightly slower charging.