Motorola Moto G23 vs Moto G42: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G23 boasts a faster chipset and quicker charging, making it a better performer overall. However, the Moto G42’s more efficient 6nm processor and potentially better display (depending on panel type) offer a compelling alternative for those prioritizing efficiency and a potentially smoother visual experience. It's a close call!
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G23 | Motorola Moto G42 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, AP/MEA | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66 - LATAM, Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - AP/MEA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2022, June 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 73.5 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.3 g (6.49 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Charcoal, Pearl White, Steel Blue | Atlantic Green, Metallic Rose |
| Models | XT2333-1 | XT2233-2 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Motorola Moto G23
- Faster Processor (Helio G85)
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Potentially Higher Refresh Rate Display (120Hz)
- Larger Screen (6.6 inches)
- Less Efficient Chipset (12nm)
- Likely IPS LCD Display
- Potentially Lower Battery Life than G42
Motorola Moto G42
- More Efficient Chipset (6nm)
- Potentially AMOLED Display (Superior Colors & Contrast)
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on Main Camera
- Compact Design
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 680)
- Slower Charging (18W)
- Potentially Lower Refresh Rate Display (90Hz)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch display, but the Moto G42 is rumored to have an AMOLED panel, offering superior contrast and vibrant colors compared to the G23's likely IPS LCD. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both. The G42 might also have a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz vs G23's 120Hz, though this is unconfirmed for the G23).
Camera Comparison
The Moto G23 typically features a 50MP main camera, while the Moto G42 often includes a 50MP main camera with OIS. Both likely have ultrawide and macro lenses. Image quality will depend on software processing and sensor size, but the G42's OIS could provide better low-light performance and more stable videos.
Performance
The Moto G23's Helio G85 chipset generally outperforms the Snapdragon 680 in raw processing power, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. The G85's octa-core architecture and 12nm process, while less efficient, provides a noticeable speed boost. The G42's 6nm Snapdragon 680 is more power-efficient, potentially leading to better battery life despite the lower performance.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery. However, the Moto G42's more efficient 6nm chipset gives it a potential edge in battery life, despite the slower 18W charging. The Moto G23's 30W charging offers significantly faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Moto G23 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and fast charging, especially those who enjoy gaming or multitasking. The Moto G42 is a great choice for users who value battery life, a potentially better display, and a more compact design.