The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Motorola Moto G22 and the Samsung Galaxy A04s. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04s edges out the Moto G22 thanks to its more efficient Exynos chipset, brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Moto G22 offers a slightly faster CPU in some areas, the A04s provides a more consistently smooth and enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 04 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 04 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired (India)
15W wired (Global) | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pearl White, Iceberg Blue, Cosmic Black, Mint Green | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | XT2231-1, XT2231-2, XT2231-5 | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 145123(v9)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G22
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially slightly faster CPU for basic tasks
- Generally reliable Motorola software support
- Less efficient chipset
- Likely dimmer display
- Slower charging (region dependent)
- Less impressive battery life
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- Brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- More efficient chipset
- Samsung's One UI software
- Potentially better video recording
- Performance can still be sluggish with demanding apps
- One UI can be bloated for some users
- 15W charging is slow
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A04s boasts a brighter display (389 nits vs. likely around 350 nits for the Moto G22, though official G22 brightness data is scarce) and a similar contrast ratio (1614:1). This translates to better visibility in outdoor conditions and more vibrant colors on the A04s. Both phones likely use similar LCD panels, so don't expect OLED quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable, with both phones offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. The A04s may have a slight edge in video recording due to Samsung's image processing. Both will struggle in low light. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
While the Moto G22's Helio G37 has a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.3 GHz vs 2.0 GHz on the A04s), the Exynos 850 in the Galaxy A04s is built on a more efficient 8nm process compared to the G37's 12nm. This generally results in better sustained performance and less thermal throttling on the A04s, even though both are entry-level chips.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A04s shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours. The Moto G22's battery capacity is likely similar, but the less efficient chipset means it won't last as long. This is a significant advantage for the A04s.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G22 is a good choice for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and potentially slightly faster CPU performance for basic tasks. The Samsung Galaxy A04s is ideal for those seeking a brighter display, longer battery life, and a more polished overall software experience, especially if Samsung's ecosystem is appealing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A04s generally offers better sustained performance due to its more efficient chipset, despite the Moto G22 having a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed.
❓ Is the Moto G22's charging speed faster?
Charging speed varies by region for the Moto G22 (20W in India, 15W globally). Regardless, both phones support 15W charging, which is relatively slow.
