Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A04s: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G offers significantly superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset. However, the Galaxy A04s boasts longer battery life and a potentially more user-friendly Samsung experience. Ultimately, the G200 is for power users, while the A04s is ideal for those prioritizing battery and affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Samsung Galaxy A04s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| Ready For support | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -30.3 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 145123(v9) GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1) GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Flagship-level performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- 5G connectivity
- Fast charging (33W)
- Battery life could be better
- Camera details are limited
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- Excellent battery life
- Affordable price
- User-friendly Samsung interface
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Lower performance compared to G200
- Dimmer display
- Slower charging (15W)
- Less powerful chipset
Display Comparison
The Moto G200 5G takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 558 nits, significantly brighter than the A04s' 389 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (1633:1 and 1614:1 respectively), ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the G200's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities (specific details are missing), the Snapdragon 888+ in the Moto G200 5G generally allows for better image processing and potentially higher-resolution video recording. The A04s likely prioritizes ease of use and consistent results over advanced features. Further research on specific camera specs is needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Here's where the Moto G200 5G truly shines. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is a powerhouse, easily handling demanding games and applications. The Galaxy A04s' Exynos 850 is adequate for everyday tasks but struggles with more intensive workloads. The G200's CPU and GPU are in a different league.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A04s edges out the Moto G200 5G in battery endurance, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours compared to the G200's 102 hours. This suggests the A04s will likely last longer on a single charge, especially with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is perfect for users who demand high performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps. It's a great choice if you want a flagship-like experience without the flagship price tag. The Samsung Galaxy A04s is best suited for users who prioritize long battery life, a simple user interface, and affordability. It's a solid option for everyday tasks and media consumption.