Motorola Moto G200 5G vs OnePlus Nord 2T: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, slightly better display brightness, and competitive performance. While the Moto G200 boasts a powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset, the Nord 2T's balanced package and superior charging make it a more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Large, vibrant display
- Excellent battery life
- Competitive price
- Slower charging speed
- Camera inconsistencies
- Software updates can be slow
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Smooth and optimized software
- Consistent camera performance
- Chipset not as powerful as Moto G200
- Design can be a bit bland
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the OnePlus Nord 2T edges ahead with a measured peak brightness of 636 nits compared to the Moto G200's 558 nits. The Nord 2T also claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value. The Moto G200's 1633:1 contrast ratio is still impressive, offering deep blacks and rich colors. Both displays are excellent for everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective. Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the Nord 2T generally produces more consistent and pleasing results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Moto G200's camera can sometimes struggle with color accuracy and dynamic range. Both offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Moto G200 5G packs a Snapdragon 888+ chipset, a flagship-level processor. However, the OnePlus Nord 2T's Dimensity 1300, while not as powerful on paper, offers excellent real-world performance and efficiency. Both phones handle demanding games and multitasking with ease, but the Nord 2T's optimized software often feels smoother.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings of 102h and 100h respectively. However, the OnePlus Nord 2T's 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in around 30 minutes, while the Moto G200's 33W charging takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power and a large display for media consumption. The OnePlus Nord 2T is a better fit for those who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more refined overall experience.