Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Moto G82: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G boasts significantly superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset. However, the Moto G82 offers better battery life and a brighter display. Ultimately, the G200 is for power users, while the G82 is a great all-rounder for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Moto G82 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Meteorite Gray, White Lily |
| Models | - | XT2225-1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Flagship-level performance
- Smooth multitasking
- Good gaming experience
- High refresh rate display
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially less refined camera software
- Larger size
Motorola Moto G82
- Excellent battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- More compact size
- Less powerful chipset
- Not ideal for demanding games
- Lower peak brightness compared to some competitors
Display Comparison
The Moto G82 takes the display crown. While the G200 has a respectable 1633:1 contrast ratio, the G82's measured 690 nits brightness is noticeably higher, making it easier to see outdoors. The G82's 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term) suggests excellent black levels. Both phones feature OLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is nuanced. Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the G200's higher-end chipset likely allows for better image processing. The G82's camera is generally well-regarded for its consistent results and pleasing color science. Detailed camera tests would be needed to definitively declare a winner, but the G200 likely has a slight edge.
Performance
The Moto G200 5G absolutely dominates in performance. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is a significant upgrade over the G82's Snapdragon 695. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the G200. The G82 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks, but it will struggle with demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
The Moto G82 shines in battery life. Its endurance rating of 130h significantly surpasses the G200's 102h. This translates to noticeably longer usage times between charges, making the G82 a more practical choice for users who prioritize longevity.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and smooth multitasking. It's a great choice for those who want a flagship-like experience without the flagship price tag. The Motorola Moto G82 is perfect for users who value battery life, a vibrant display, and a balanced overall experience. It's a solid choice for everyday tasks, photography, and media consumption.