Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Moto G73: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G boasts significantly superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset and exceptional battery life. However, the Moto G73 offers a more modern design and potentially better value depending on pricing. The G200 is the performance king, while the G73 is a more balanced option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Moto G73 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2023, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-resistant design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Lucent White, Midnight Blue |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Flagship-level performance
- Exceptional battery life
- High refresh rate display
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially older design
- LCD display (vs AMOLED)
- Camera performance may not be top-tier
Motorola Moto G73
- Modern design
- Likely AMOLED display
- Good value for money
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Camera may lack detail in certain conditions
Display Comparison
The Moto G73 likely features a more modern AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks compared to the G200's LCD. While the G200 boasts an impressive 1633:1 contrast ratio, the G73's AMOLED panel will likely provide a superior viewing experience. Both offer high refresh rates (likely 120Hz on both) for smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is complex. The G200 likely has a higher resolution main sensor, but the G73's newer image processing and potentially improved software could result in better overall image quality, especially in low light. Both phones likely offer versatile camera systems with ultrawide and macro lenses. Detailed camera tests are needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
The G200's Snapdragon 888+ is a clear winner here. It's a flagship-level chipset that delivers significantly faster performance than the G73's Dimensity 930. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the G200. The G73 is still capable, but it won't match the G200's raw power.
Battery Life
The Moto G200 5G's endurance rating of 102h is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the G73. While the G73's battery capacity is likely comparable, the G200's efficient chipset contributes to its impressive longevity. Expect the G200 to easily last a full day and a half, or even two, on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for users prioritizing raw power, gaming, and long battery life. It's a great choice for those who want flagship-level performance without the flagship price tag. The Motorola Moto G73 is better suited for users who value a sleek design, a smooth display, and a more budget-friendly price point, with a focus on everyday tasks and photography.