Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Moto G72: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G boasts a significantly more powerful processor, making it the clear winner for performance-focused users. However, the Moto G72 edges out with slightly better battery life and a brighter display, offering a compelling package for everyday use and media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Moto G72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, September 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Meteorite Gray, Polar Blue, Mineral White |
| Models | - | XT2255-1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 383317 (v9) GeekBench: 1842 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Flagship-level performance
- Excellent display contrast
- 5G connectivity
- Large display
- Lower peak brightness than G72
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Design can feel bulky
Motorola Moto G72
- Brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- Sleek design
- Good value for money
- Less powerful processor
- Camera not as detailed as G200
- No expandable storage (likely)
Display Comparison
The Moto G72 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1015 nits, significantly brighter than the G200's 558 nits. While the G200 boasts an impressive 1633:1 contrast ratio, the G72's higher brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Both offer large, immersive screens, but the G72's visibility is a noticeable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the G200 generally produces slightly more detailed images, especially in good lighting. Low-light performance is comparable. Video recording quality is decent on both, though neither excels in this area. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be detailed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here, the Moto G200 5G dominates. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is a flagship-level processor, offering significantly faster performance than the G72's Helio G99. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the G200.
Battery Life
The Moto G72 secures a narrow victory in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 121 hours compared to the G200's 102 hours. While both offer all-day battery life, the G72 provides a bit more breathing room.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for gamers, power users, and those who prioritize raw performance. The Moto G72 is a great choice for everyday users, students, and anyone seeking a reliable phone with good battery life and a vibrant display without breaking the bank.