Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Moto G32: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G is the clear winner for performance and display, boasting a Snapdragon 888+ and a vibrant screen. However, the Moto G32 offers better value for budget-conscious buyers, providing a solid experience without breaking the bank. It depends on your priorities!
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Moto G32 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro/depth) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold |
| Models | - | XT2235-2, XT2235-3 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | ₹ 8,990 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Flagship-level performance
- Excellent display quality
- Outstanding battery life
- 5G connectivity
- Premium design
- Potentially higher price
- Larger size may not suit everyone
- Software updates could be slower
Motorola Moto G32
- Affordable price
- Compact and lightweight design
- Decent camera performance
- Good battery life for its size
- Mid-range performance
- Less vibrant display
- No 5G connectivity
- Slower charging
Display Comparison
The Moto G200 5G features a large 6.8-inch OLED display with a 1633:1 contrast ratio and a measured peak brightness of 558 nits, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility. The Moto G32 has a smaller 6.5-inch AMOLED display, likely with a lower peak brightness, but still providing good color reproduction. The G200's larger size and superior brightness give it a significant edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups. The G200 typically features a 64MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a depth sensor, capable of recording 8K video. The G32 usually has a 50MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, and a macro lens. While the G32's main sensor boasts a higher megapixel count, the G200's superior processor and likely better image processing algorithms likely result in better overall image quality, especially in low light and video recording.
Performance
Here's where the G200 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is a powerhouse, easily handling demanding games and multitasking. The G32's Snapdragon 680 is a capable mid-range chip, suitable for everyday tasks but struggling with intensive applications. The G200's CPU and GPU are significantly faster.
Battery Life
The Moto G200 5G boasts an exceptional endurance rating of 102 hours, indicating outstanding battery life. The Moto G32, while offering decent battery life, likely falls short of the G200's longevity, despite having a smaller battery capacity. The G200's efficient chipset contributes to its impressive battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for users who prioritize speed, gaming, and a premium display experience. The Moto G32 is a great choice for those seeking a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and photography.