Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Moto G30: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G delivers significantly faster performance thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset. However, the Moto G30 boasts exceptional battery life and a slightly better display contrast. Ultimately, the G200 is for power users, while the G30 is ideal for those prioritizing longevity and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Moto G30 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2021, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2021, March 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W / 20W wired (market dependent) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Phantom Black (Dark Pearl), Pastel Sky |
| Models | - | XT2129-1, XT2129-2, PAML0000IN |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1984:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 170968 (v8) GeekBench: 1265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Flagship-level performance
- 5G connectivity
- Vibrant OLED display
- Good camera quality
- Fast charging (33W)
- Shorter battery life than G30
- Potentially higher price
- Design can feel bulky
Motorola Moto G30
- Exceptional battery life
- Affordable price
- Good display contrast
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor
- Less vibrant display (IPS LCD)
- Slower charging (15W/20W)
- No 5G
Display Comparison
The Moto G200 5G features a 6.8-inch OLED display with a 1633:1 contrast ratio and a measured peak brightness of 558 nits, offering vibrant colors and good visibility. The Moto G30 has a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display with a 1975:1 contrast ratio and 468 nits brightness. While the G30's contrast is slightly higher, the G200's OLED technology provides superior black levels and overall image quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups. The G200 5G typically features a 64MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a depth sensor. The G30 usually has a 64MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, and a macro lens. Image quality is generally good on both, but the G200 5G often captures slightly more detail and better dynamic range, especially in well-lit conditions. Video recording capabilities are also superior on the G200.
Performance
This is where the G200 5G truly shines. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is a powerhouse, easily handling demanding games and applications. The G30's Snapdragon 662 is a capable mid-range chip, but it's noticeably slower and less responsive compared to the G200 5G. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the G200.
Battery Life
The Moto G30 takes the crown in battery life. Its large battery (typically 5000mAh) and efficient processor result in an impressive endurance rating of 131 hours. The G200 5G, while still offering decent battery life, doesn't quite match the G30's longevity due to its more power-hungry chipset (typically 4500mAh, 102h endurance).
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is perfect for users who demand smooth performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps. It's a great choice if you want 5G connectivity and a flagship-like experience without breaking the bank. The Motorola Moto G30 is best suited for users who prioritize battery life above all else, and those on a tighter budget who still want a reliable and capable smartphone.