Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Motorola Edge 30: Clash of the Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G delivers significantly more raw power thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset. However, the Edge 30 boasts a more premium design, a smoother display, and a more refined overall experience. It depends on your priorities: power or polish.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Edge 30 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, May 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.4 x 74.2 x 6.8 mm (6.28 x 2.92 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Meteor Grey, Supermoon Silver, Aurora Green |
| Models | - | XT2203-1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | $ 529.00 / € 168.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Exceptional Performance (Snapdragon 888+)
- Large Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Competitive Price
- Bulky Design
- IPS LCD Display (not as vibrant as OLED)
- Less Refined Software Experience
Motorola Edge 30
- Sleek and Premium Design
- Vibrant OLED Display (144Hz)
- Refined Software Experience
- More Compact Size
- Less Powerful Processor
- Shorter Battery Life
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 features a 6.5-inch OLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The G200 has a larger 6.8-inch IPS LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate. While the G200's display is large, the Edge 30's OLED technology provides superior contrast and color accuracy. The G200's brightness is also slightly lower.
Camera Comparison
The G200 boasts a 108MP main camera, while the Edge 30 features a 50MP main camera. Both phones offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions. However, the Edge 30 generally produces more natural-looking colors and better dynamic range. Low-light performance is comparable, but the Edge 30's image processing tends to be more refined. Both have ultrawide and macro lenses, but quality varies.
Performance
This is where the G200 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is significantly more powerful than the Edge 30's Snapdragon 778G+. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the G200. The Edge 30 is still capable, but it won't handle demanding tasks as effortlessly.
Battery Life
The Moto G200 5G has a larger 5000mAh battery and an endurance rating of 102h, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Edge 30 has a 4400mAh battery. While both support 33W charging, the G200's larger battery capacity means it will take longer to fully charge, but it will last significantly longer between charges.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance on a budget. The Motorola Edge 30 is a better choice for those who value a sleek design, a vibrant display, and a more streamlined user experience, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.