Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Clash of the Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 20 Pro edges out the G200 with a slightly brighter display, more refined camera software, and a more premium feel. However, the G200 offers a more powerful processor for demanding tasks, making it a strong contender for gamers and power users on a budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G200 5G | Motorola Edge 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 10 | Available. Released 2021, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud |
| Models | - | XT2153-1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 102h | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.7 LUFS (Good) | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Excellent battery life
- Aggressive pricing
- 5G Connectivity
- Less refined camera software
- Bulkier design
- Potentially less consistent camera results
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Brighter display
- More premium design
- Refined camera software
- Slightly better overall user experience
- Slightly less powerful processor
- Slower charging (30W vs 33W)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Edge 20 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 673 nits, slightly surpassing the G200's 558 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1633:1 for G200, 'Infinite' for Edge 20 Pro - likely a marketing term), the Edge 20 Pro's higher brightness provides better visibility in direct sunlight. Both utilize OLED panels, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the Edge 20 Pro generally delivers more refined image processing and a more user-friendly camera app. The G200's camera is capable, but sometimes produces slightly less consistent results. Both offer excellent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Moto G200 5G takes the performance crown with its Snapdragon 888+ chipset. This chip offers a noticeable performance boost over the Edge 20 Pro's Snapdragon 870, particularly in demanding games and applications. Both phones have ample RAM, but the G200's raw power is undeniable.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an impressive endurance rating of 102h/112h respectively, indicating excellent battery life. Real-world usage will likely see similar performance from both, easily lasting a full day for most users.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and 5G connectivity without breaking the bank. It's a great choice for gamers and those who frequently multitask. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better suited for users who value a premium design, a brighter display, and a more polished camera experience, even if it means sacrificing a bit of processing power.