Poco M3 Pro 5G vs. Motorola Moto G20: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Moto G20’s Unisoc T700, and the 18W charging is significantly faster than the G20’s 10W. While battery endurance is similar, the Poco’s overall responsiveness makes it the better daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G20 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 26 | 2021, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 09 | Available. Released 2021, May 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Breeze Blue, Flamingo Pink | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | XT2128-1, XT2128-2 | M2103K19PG, M2103K19PI, M2103K19PY |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1475:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.9 LUFS (Good) |
Motorola Moto G20
- Lowest possible price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Functional for basic tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited display brightness
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
- Faster Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- 18W fast charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slightly higher price
- Camera specs lack detail
- May not be the best choice for extreme budget constraints
Display Comparison
The Poco M3 Pro 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 536 nits compared to the Moto G20’s unspecified brightness. Both share a 1475:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color reproduction quality. However, the Poco’s higher peak brightness will translate to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. The lack of detailed display specs for the Moto G20 makes a precise comparison difficult, but the Poco clearly has the edge in usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. Given the price points, image quality will likely be similar in good lighting conditions. However, the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s more powerful processor could enable better image processing algorithms, potentially leading to improved low-light performance and more detailed photos. Without further specifications, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Poco’s chipset gives it a potential advantage.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco M3 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) utilizes a more efficient manufacturing process and a superior CPU configuration – specifically, 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Moto G20’s Unisoc T700’s octa-core 1.8 GHz setup. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Poco. The Dimensity 700’s integrated 5G modem also provides faster and more reliable 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola Moto G20 and the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Moto G20’s slow 10W charging. This means the Poco can be topped up much faster, minimizing downtime and providing greater convenience. While both will likely last a full day, the Poco’s charging speed is a clear win.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G20 if you prioritize absolute minimum cost and are willing to accept significantly slower performance for basic tasks like browsing and messaging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G if you want a smoother, more responsive experience, faster charging, and the ability to handle more demanding apps and occasional gaming without significant lag.