The Motorola Moto G15 Power and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Moto G15 Power prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Poco X6 Pro focuses on delivering flagship-level performance at a competitive price. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Motorola Moto G15 Power is the clear winner, boasting an incredible 62+ hour endurance. However, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro takes the lead for performance-focused users, thanks to its significantly more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 12 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Grey, Iguana Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | XT2521-5 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | € 158.46 / $ 350.55 / £ 207.53 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 62:07h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G15 Power
- Exceptional battery life (62+ hours)
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Less powerful processor
- Display likely lacks brightness and vibrancy
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8300 Ultra)
- Brighter display (1148 nits)
- Faster charging (67W with QC/PD)
- Shorter battery life (11h 46m)
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, compared to the Moto G15 Power’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Moto G15 Power’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. We expect the X6 Pro to offer superior color vibrancy and contrast. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, but the X6 Pro’s display is the clear standout feature.
Camera Comparison
The context data only mentions 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the Poco X6 Pro, lacking specific sensor details. However, given its positioning, we anticipate a capable main sensor, potentially with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Moto G15 Power’s camera specifications are also absent. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume the Poco X6 Pro will offer more advanced image processing capabilities and potentially better low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. We would caution against expecting high-end camera performance from either device, as both fall into the budget/mid-range category.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is considerable. The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a modern, high-performance chipset featuring an octa-core configuration with a Cortex-A715 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Motorola Moto G15 Power’s older Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme (12nm) which utilizes Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, resulting in sustained performance during demanding tasks. The X6 Pro’s CPU architecture is also more modern, leading to faster single-core and multi-core performance. While RAM details are missing for both, the X6 Pro is likely to benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its responsiveness.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Moto G15 Power truly shines, achieving an impressive 62 hours and 7 minutes of endurance. This is significantly longer than the Poco X6 Pro’s 11 hours and 46 minutes of active use. However, the Poco X6 Pro compensates with much faster charging: 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support, promising a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Moto G15 Power’s 30W charging is considerably slower. The G15 Power’s 1000 cycle battery claim suggests a focus on long-term battery health, while the X6 Pro prioritizes quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G15 Power if you need a phone that can reliably last through multiple days of moderate use, and charging speed isn't a top priority. It's ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, demanding apps, and content creation, and are willing to charge your phone more often. It’s the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme in the Moto G15 Power struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Helio G81 Extreme is a budget-focused chipset. While it can handle less intensive games, Genshin Impact and other graphically demanding titles will likely require significant graphics settings reductions and may still experience frame drops. The Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra is far better suited for gaming.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro compare to typical fast charging standards?
67W charging is considered very fast for a mid-range phone. Combined with the Poco X6 Pro’s support for QC2.0 and PD3.0, it allows for a full charge in approximately 45 minutes, significantly faster than the Moto G15 Power’s 30W charging. This is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the battery life difference between the Moto G15 Power and Poco X6 Pro noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The Moto G15 Power’s 62+ hour endurance means you can easily go two or even three days between charges with moderate use. The Poco X6 Pro, while still offering decent battery life, will likely require daily charging, especially with heavier usage.
❓ Will the Moto G15 Power's battery health degrade significantly faster than the Poco X6 Pro's, despite the 1000 cycle claim?
The 1000 cycle claim suggests Motorola has implemented measures to preserve battery health over the long term. However, the Poco X6 Pro's faster charging and more efficient chipset *could* result in fewer overall charge cycles over the phone's lifespan, potentially mitigating some degradation. It's a complex factor, but the G15 Power's claim is a positive indicator.
