Moto G15 Power vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Camera
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and value, the Motorola Moto G15 Power is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7a excels in camera performance and offers a smoother, more responsive user experience thanks to its superior chipset, making it ideal for photography enthusiasts and those invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G15 Power | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 12 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gravity Grey, Iguana Green | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | XT2521-5 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | € 158.46 / $ 350.55 / £ 207.53 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:07h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G15 Power
- Exceptional battery life (62:07h endurance)
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Less powerful processor (Helio G81)
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Potentially lower display quality
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior performance (Google Tensor G2)
- Excellent camera quality and image processing
- Brighter and more vibrant OLED display
- Shorter battery life (76h endurance)
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Moto G15 Power. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Moto G15 Power’s display specs are unknown, it’s likely a standard LCD panel, whereas the Pixel 7a utilizes an OLED panel offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (assumed based on Pixel A-series trends) would also provide a smoother scrolling experience than the likely 60Hz panel on the Moto G15 Power.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing, Google’s computational photography prowess, combined with its image processing algorithms, consistently delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also likely superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP). The Moto G15 Power’s camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots, but it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s dynamic range, detail, or low-light performance. The absence of OIS on the Moto G15 Power (assumed) further disadvantages it in video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The Google Tensor G2 (5nm) in the Pixel 7a represents a substantial leap in processing power over the MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme (12nm) found in the Moto G15 Power. The Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.85 GHz, delivers significantly faster single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The Pixel 7a’s CPU configuration (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) is architecturally more advanced than the Moto G15 Power’s (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55), resulting in better multi-tasking and gaming performance. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G15 Power’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 62:07 hours. This is significantly longer than the Pixel 7a’s 76-hour rating (which is likely based on older testing methodologies). While the Pixel 7a offers 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, the Moto G15 Power’s 30W wired charging provides faster replenishment. The Moto G15 Power also boasts a claimed 1000 charge cycles, suggesting greater long-term battery health. The larger battery capacity of the Moto G15 Power, combined with the less power-hungry Helio G81 chipset, is the key to its impressive longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G15 Power if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and if your budget is a primary concern. It’s perfect for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a fluid user experience powered by the Tensor G2, and access to Google’s exclusive software features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen. It’s the better choice for content creators and those who demand a responsive and feature-rich smartphone.