The Motorola Moto G100S and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver strong performance without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches – the G100S prioritizing efficiency with a newer Snapdragon chipset, while the F3 GT focuses on raw power and rapid charging with a Dimensity 1200. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient power management, the Motorola Moto G100S emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, offers a balance of power and thermal control that the Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 struggles to match, despite the latter’s faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 03 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 03 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | - | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Balanced performance for everyday use
- Slower 30W charging
- Likely less peak gaming performance than the F3 GT
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 1200 processor
- Ideal for demanding games
- Less efficient Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processors. Display quality is likely similar, leaning towards adequate for the price point. Bezels are expected to be moderate on both, typical of this segment. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both likely operate at 60Hz, impacting smoothness in fast-paced games.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will rely on multi-camera systems with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The image processing style will likely differ – Xiaomi often favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Motorola tends towards a more natural look. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone prioritizes optical image stabilization, potentially impacting low-light photography.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT’s MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a more aggressive CPU configuration – a single 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core, supported by three additional 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Motorola Moto G100S’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) which utilizes four 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and four 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon offers a significant advantage in thermal efficiency, meaning the G100S is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While the Dimensity 1200 boasts higher clock speeds, the Snapdragon’s architecture and process node provide a more consistent performance profile. RAM speed (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR4X, if applicable) is not specified, but would further influence real-world performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT’s 67W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a full charge in just 42 minutes with support for PD3.0 and QC3. The Motorola Moto G100S offers a more modest 30W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s superior efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the G100S, providing comparable real-world battery life despite the slower charging speed. The F3 GT’s faster charging is ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you need a phone that balances performance with long-term efficiency, and appreciate a more refined software experience. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, moderate gaming, and users who value battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize peak gaming performance, demand the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to accept potentially more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load. It’s geared towards hardcore mobile gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, but its 6nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm process. This means the Poco F3 GT is more likely to experience thermal throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially leading to reduced performance to manage heat.
❓ How much faster is the Poco F3 GT's charging compared to the Moto G100S?
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging can fully charge the device in approximately 42 minutes, while the Moto G100S’s 30W charging will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 90 minutes, depending on battery capacity. This makes the F3 GT ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 a significant upgrade over previous Snapdragon 6-series chips?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 represents a substantial improvement, primarily due to its 4nm fabrication process. This results in significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to older 6-series chips, allowing for sustained performance without excessive heat.
