The Motorola Moto G100 and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market, but cater to slightly different priorities. The G100 emphasizes endurance and a balanced experience, while the F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with its faster charging and powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers noticeably superior performance, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Moto G100 boasts impressive battery endurance, the F3 GT’s speed and gaming focus provide a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 14 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, Laser AF
16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
TOF 3D | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.4, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Ready For support | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | XT2533-4 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 100h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1427:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 556137 (v8)
GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 47fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G100
- Exceptional battery endurance (100h rating)
- Potentially better thermal efficiency due to 4nm process
- Balanced all-around smartphone experience
- Less powerful chipset compared to the F3 GT
- Slower charging speed (30W)
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Significantly faster performance with Dimensity 1200
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (0-100% in 42 minutes)
- Optimized for gaming and demanding tasks
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the G100
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones lack detailed display specifications beyond the Moto G100’s 1427:1 contrast ratio. However, given the F3 GT’s gaming focus, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel than the G100, a crucial element for smooth visuals. The G100’s contrast ratio suggests a decent viewing experience, but without knowing the peak brightness or color gamut coverage of either device, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of LTPO technology on either suggests neither will dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo/Video' for the Moto G100, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning of both devices, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize similar sensor sizes and image processing techniques. The F3 GT, being marketed towards a more enthusiast audience, may have slightly more refined software algorithms. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests neither prioritizes exceptional camera capabilities; these are largely marketing features with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) holds a clear advantage over the Motorola Moto G100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm). The Dimensity 1200’s core configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a more aggressive performance profile than the G100’s 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55. The 6nm process node on the Dimensity 1200, while slightly larger than the G100’s 4nm, doesn’t negate the architectural advantage in core speeds and configuration. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the F3 GT. The G100’s 4nm node *should* offer better efficiency, but the Dimensity 1200’s raw power likely outweighs this benefit.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G100 boasts an endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT compensates for a potentially smaller battery capacity with its blazing-fast 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 42 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime and makes the F3 GT more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While the G100 offers longer runtimes between charges, the F3 GT’s charging speed mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G100 if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and a more conservative, all-around smartphone experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day without easy access to charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you’re a mobile gamer or power user who demands maximum performance and appreciates incredibly fast charging. The F3 GT is built for intensive tasks and minimizes interruptions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT's Dimensity 1200 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and while it *can* generate heat under sustained load, the Poco F3 GT incorporates cooling solutions to mitigate throttling. Expect some warmth, but not necessarily performance-crippling overheating. The G100's 7s Gen 2 should run cooler, but at the cost of overall performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT compared to the Moto G100's 30W charging?
The 67W charging on the F3 GT is significantly faster. Xiaomi claims a full charge in 42 minutes, while the Moto G100 will take considerably longer with its 30W charging. This difference is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery before heading out.
❓ Does the Moto G100 support 5G connectivity?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 typically includes 5G modem capabilities. Therefore, it's highly probable the Moto G100 supports 5G, but specific band compatibility should be verified before purchase.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Dimensity 1200 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference may be minimal. However, when launching demanding apps, multitasking, or playing graphically intensive games, the Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
