Motorola consistently delivers solid mid-range smartphones, and the Moto G100 and G30 are prime examples. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G100 clearly wins on performance thanks to its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset. However, the G30 boasts a brighter display and potentially longer battery life depending on usage. If raw power is your priority, the G100 is the better choice; otherwise, the G30 offers a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 14 | 2021, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, March 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, Laser AF
16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
TOF 3D | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.4, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| | Ready For support | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 15W / 20W wired (market dependent) |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Phantom Black (Dark Pearl), Pastel Sky |
| Models | XT2533-4 | XT2129-1, XT2129-2, PAML0000IN |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 100h
|
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1427:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1984:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 556137 (v8)
GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 47fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 170968 (v8)
GeekBench: 1265 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G100
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 7s Gen 2)
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Larger RAM (likely, based on G100's positioning)
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Lower Endurance Rating (100h)
- Display not as bright as G30
- Potentially Higher Price
Motorola Moto G30
- Brighter Display (468 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (131h endurance)
- More Affordable
- Good Value for Money
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 662)
- Potentially Inferior Camera Quality
- Slower Charging (15W/20W)
Display Comparison
The Moto G30 takes the display crown. While the G100 has a respectable contrast ratio of 1427:1, the G30’s 1975:1 contrast ratio and measured 468 nits brightness provide a noticeably more vibrant and easily viewable screen, especially outdoors. Both offer a large display, but the G30’s brightness is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the G100's more powerful processor allows for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. However, without specific sensor details, a definitive camera winner is difficult to declare. User reviews suggest the G100 has a slight edge in image quality.
Performance
Here, the Moto G100 dominates. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is a substantial upgrade over the G30’s Snapdragon 662. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the G100. The G30 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks, but the G100 offers a noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The Moto G30 initially appears to have the edge with an endurance rating of 131h, compared to the G100's 100h. However, endurance ratings can vary based on testing conditions. The G100's more powerful processor may consume more power under heavy load, potentially negating the initial advantage. Both offer excellent battery life for their respective price points.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G100 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, enjoy gaming, and want a smoother overall experience. The Moto G30 is a great pick for those seeking excellent battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing essential features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Moto G100 worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and a smoother user experience, the G100's Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset justifies the higher price. However, if you're on a tighter budget and value battery life and a bright display, the G30 is a compelling alternative.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Motorola generally provides timely software updates. Both phones will likely receive Android updates for a reasonable period, but specific timelines are not always guaranteed. Check Motorola's official website for the latest update information.
