Motorola G100 vs Edge 20 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers noticeably faster performance, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the G100’s newer 4nm process offers improved efficiency, and may appeal to those prioritizing longevity and less heat.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G100 | Motorola Edge 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 14 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) |
| Water repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, Laser AF 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm, PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) TOF 3D | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.4, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud |
| Models | XT2533-4 | XT2153-1 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1427:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 556137 (v8) GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1) GFXBench: 47fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G100
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
- Lower endurance rating compared to Edge 20 Pro
- Display likely less bright than Edge 20 Pro
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher initial endurance rating
- 7nm process less efficient than G100’s 4nm
- Potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load
- Generally higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro boasts a brighter display, measured at 673 nits, compared to the G100’s unspecified peak brightness. While the G100’s contrast ratio of 1427:1 is respectable, the Edge 20 Pro claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, likely due to its OLED panel. This translates to deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. Both devices likely utilize similar LCD technology, but the Edge 20 Pro’s higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but without specific sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Edge 20 Pro’s positioning as a more premium device, it likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and improved image processing. The G100’s camera is likely competent, but the Edge 20 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of sensor size data prevents a more granular analysis.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Edge 20 Pro’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) features a 1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 prime core, significantly outperforming the G100’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) with its 2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. While the G100 benefits from a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process, the 870’s architectural advantages provide a substantial performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The Edge 20 Pro’s GPU will also deliver a superior gaming experience. The G100’s efficiency gains may translate to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads, but the 870 still holds a clear performance lead.
Battery Life
The Edge 20 Pro and G100 both support 30W wired charging. However, the Edge 20 Pro initially had an endurance rating of 112 hours, while the G100 has a 100-hour rating. This suggests the Edge 20 Pro, despite potentially higher power draw from the Snapdragon 870, manages battery consumption more effectively, or has a slightly larger battery capacity. The G100’s 4nm chipset should contribute to improved efficiency, but the initial endurance rating favors the Edge 20 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G100 if you need extended battery life and are comfortable with slightly less raw processing power. It’s a strong contender for users who prioritize endurance and value. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and are willing to accept slightly shorter battery life.