Motorola Moto G9 Power vs. Moto G10: Which Budget Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G9 Power is the better choice. Its significantly brighter display (521 nits vs 370 nits) and faster 20W charging outweigh the G10’s higher contrast ratio, especially given the similar battery endurance ratings.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G10 | Motorola Moto G9 Power |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe, APEM |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 28, 66 - LATAM | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 16 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 27 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 2), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.2 mm (6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 172.1 x 76.8 x 9.7 mm (6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.6, 1/3", AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 590 h (2G) / Up to 790 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 21 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 11 h 40 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Grey, Iridescent Pearl | Electric Violet, Metallic Sage |
| Models | XT2127-2 | XT2091-3, XT2091-4 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.21 W/kg (head) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 149.99 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 485.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -90.3dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 152h | Endurance rating 155h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 11878:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1680:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.2 LUFS (Average) | -28.6 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 140230 (v8) GeekBench: 1139 (v5.1) GFXBench: 9.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 182875 (v8) GeekBench: 1374 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G10
- Higher contrast ratio for deeper blacks
- Slightly longer battery endurance rating
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly dimmer display
- Slower Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Slower 10W charging
Motorola Moto G9 Power
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Faster 20W charging
- More responsive user experience
- Lower contrast ratio
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Moto G9 Power boasts a considerably brighter display, reaching 521 nits compared to the G10’s 370 nits. This translates to significantly improved visibility under direct sunlight. While the G10 features a higher nominal contrast ratio of 11878:1 versus the G9 Power’s 1680:1, the practical impact of this difference is less noticeable than the brightness disparity. Both displays utilize LCD technology, and neither offers high refresh rates, focusing instead on maximizing battery life. The G9 Power’s superior brightness makes it the clear winner for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both the Moto G9 Power and G10 feature a similar 'Photo / Video' camera setup, lacking detailed specifications in the provided data. However, given Motorola’s typical approach in this price segment, it’s reasonable to assume both phones rely on a primary sensor for most image capture, supplemented by auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. The G9 Power’s slightly higher price point *suggests* a potentially more refined image processing pipeline, but this remains speculative.
Performance
The Moto G9 Power’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset represents a substantial upgrade over the G10’s Snapdragon 460. The 662 features Kryo 260 Gold and Silver cores clocked up to 2.0 GHz, compared to the G10’s Kryo 240 cores at 1.8 GHz. This results in noticeably faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are 11nm, the architectural improvements in the 662 provide a tangible performance boost. The G9 Power is better equipped to handle demanding apps and light gaming. Both phones share 4GB of RAM in common configurations, but the chipset difference is the defining factor.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery endurance, with the G9 Power achieving 155 hours and the G10 152 hours in endurance testing. This indicates similar real-world battery life. However, the G9 Power’s 20W wired charging is a significant advantage over the G10’s 10W charging. This means the G9 Power can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime. While the battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any minor capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G10 if you prioritize a visually striking display with deep blacks and are comfortable with slower 10W charging. This phone is ideal for media consumption in dimly lit environments. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Power if you value a brighter, more visible screen outdoors, and need the convenience of faster charging, making it a better fit for users on the go.