The Motorola Moto G06 and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 smartphone market. While both offer 5G connectivity, they diverge significantly in their approaches to battery life, performance, and charging speed, making the choice less straightforward than it appears. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing exceptional battery life and sustained performance over rapid charging, the Motorola Moto G06 emerges as the winner. Its Helio G81 chipset and impressive 55:21h endurance rating outweigh the Galaxy A23 5G’s faster 25W charging, especially considering the A23’s comparatively limited 138h endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 05 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 23 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.4 x 77.5 x 8.3 mm (6.75 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Laurel Oak, Arabesque, Tapestry, Tendril | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | XT2535-1, XT2535-2, XT2535-3, XT2535-14 | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 55:21h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Motorola Moto G06
- Exceptional battery life (55:21h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1200 cycles)
- Efficient Mediatek Helio G81 chipset
- Slower 10W charging
- Limited display specifications
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Brighter display (508 nits)
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset (6nm)
- Significantly shorter battery life (138h endurance)
- Potentially less battery health longevity
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 508 nits, compared to the Moto G06’s unspecified brightness. Both displays share a 1328:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar dynamic range. However, the A23’s higher peak brightness will be more noticeable in direct sunlight. The Moto G06’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and panel technology unanswered. The A23’s larger screen size (assumed, based on typical A-series sizing) also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume the Galaxy A23 5G, given Samsung’s camera expertise, will offer more refined image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the A23 is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit. The Moto G06’s camera performance remains largely unknown without further specifications.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G in the Galaxy A23 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a theoretical performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G06’s Mediatek Helio G81 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores clock slightly higher at 2.2 GHz versus the G81’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. However, the real-world performance difference may be less pronounced in everyday tasks. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The G06’s Helio G81 is still capable, but the A23 has a clear architectural edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G06’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 55:21 hours. This is significantly longer than the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s 138 hours. While the A23 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups, the Moto G06’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The G06’s reported 1200 charge cycles suggest a higher level of battery health retention over the device’s lifespan. The A23’s faster charging is convenient, but the G06’s endurance is a more substantial advantage for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G06 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value consistent performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a slightly brighter display, and are willing to compromise on overall battery endurance. The A23 is also a better choice for users heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Galaxy A23 5G compared to the Moto G06?
The Galaxy A23 5G’s 25W charging is significantly faster than the Moto G06’s 10W charging. While exact 0-100% times aren’t available, the A23 5G will likely charge fully in around 1.5-2 hours, while the Moto G06 could take 3+ hours. However, the G06’s exceptional battery life means you’ll need to charge it less frequently.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Galaxy A23 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you’ll likely need to lower graphics settings for a smooth experience. The 6nm process helps with thermal management, but sustained performance may still be limited. The Moto G06’s Helio G81 is less powerful, and may require even more aggressive settings adjustments.
❓ Is the battery on the Moto G06 likely to degrade quickly with its 1200 charge cycle rating?
No, 1200 charge cycles is a very high number, indicating excellent battery health longevity. It suggests the battery will retain a significant portion of its capacity even after years of regular use, far exceeding the typical lifespan of most smartphone batteries.
