The Motorola Moto G05 and Samsung Galaxy A25 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. The G05 prioritizes exceptional battery life, while the A25 focuses on a brighter display and a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Motorola Moto G05 is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 60:22h endurance. However, the Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a significantly brighter display and a more efficient chipset, making it the better choice for those who value performance and visual experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2023, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 13 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Market/region dependent |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Plum Red, Fresh Lavender, Forest Green, Misty Blue | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Models | XT2523-2, XT2523-3, XT2523-11 | SM-A256E, SM-A256E/DS, SM-A256E/DSN, SM-A256B, SM-A256B/DS, SM-A256B/DSN, SM-A256U, SM-A256U1 |
| Price | € 82.38 / $ 108.00 / £ 77.00 / ₹ 7,316 | € 175.99 / $ 120.32 / ₹ 18,399 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 60:22h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G05
- Exceptional battery life (60:22h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Older chipset (Helio G81)
- Display brightness likely lower than A25
- Camera specs unknown
Samsung Galaxy A25
- Brighter display (1030 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Exynos 1280, 5nm)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:19h)
- Potentially higher price
- 2MP macro camera likely offers limited value
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A25 immediately distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1030 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Moto G05 (brightness data unavailable). While the G05's panel technology isn't specified, the A25's higher brightness suggests a more advanced LCD or AMOLED panel. The lack of refresh rate information for both devices places them firmly in the standard 60Hz category, but the A25's brightness advantage is a significant win for outdoor use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Samsung's image processing expertise, the A25 is likely to produce more refined images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A25 is unlikely to be a significant selling point, as image quality from such sensors is often subpar. The G05's camera specs are entirely unknown, making it difficult to assess its capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A25's Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G05's MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme (12nm). The Exynos 1280 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the G05's Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature an octa-core configuration, the A25's chipset is expected to deliver a smoother experience in demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G05 boasts an exceptional 60:22h endurance rating, indicating remarkable battery life. This is contrasted by the Samsung Galaxy A25's active use score of 10:19h. While the A25 offers faster 25W wired charging compared to the G05's 18W, the G05's significantly larger endurance means fewer charging cycles are needed. The G05 also claims 1000 battery cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before significant degradation. The A25's faster charging is convenient, but the G05's longevity and endurance are more impactful for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G05 if you need a phone that can reliably last two full days on a single charge, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A25 if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, smoother performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, and faster charging capabilities, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A25 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280's 5nm fabrication process is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the Moto G05's 12nm Helio G81. While some throttling is possible under sustained heavy load, it's less likely to be a significant issue than with the G05, which will likely experience more pronounced performance drops due to heat.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Samsung Galaxy A25 worth considering for photography?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited practical value. Image quality is often soft and lacks detail. While it can be fun to experiment with close-up shots, don't expect professional-level results. The A25's primary camera will be far more important for overall image quality.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G05 with the 18W charger?
While the Moto G05 supports 18W charging, its large battery capacity means a full 0-100% charge will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. The slower charging speed is a trade-off for the exceptional battery endurance.
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A25 support 90fps gameplay in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Exynos 1280 is capable of handling PUBG Mobile, but achieving a consistent 90fps frame rate will depend on the graphics settings selected. Expect to need to lower the settings to 'Smooth' or 'Balanced' to maintain a stable 90fps experience. The G05 will likely struggle to maintain even 60fps in PUBG Mobile.
