Google Pixel 7a vs. Motorola Moto G05: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice, offering a significantly better camera experience and smoother performance thanks to the Tensor G2 chipset. However, the Motorola Moto G05 excels in battery endurance, lasting considerably longer on a single charge, making it ideal for users prioritizing longevity over all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G05 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 13 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Plum Red, Fresh Lavender, Forest Green, Misty Blue | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | XT2523-2, XT2523-3, XT2523-11 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | € 82.38 / $ 108.00 / £ 77.00 / ₹ 7,316 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60:22h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G05
- Superior camera performance with Google’s computational photography
- Faster and more efficient Google Tensor G2 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Wireless charging and PD3.0 support
- Shorter battery life compared to the Moto G05
- Higher price point
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional battery endurance (60:22h)
- More affordable price
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 cycles)
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Inferior camera quality
- Less vibrant display
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the Moto G05’s unspecified brightness. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Moto G05’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Pixel 7a likely utilizes an OLED panel offering richer colors and deeper blacks. The Pixel 7a’s display is also likely to have a higher refresh rate (though not specified), contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. The G05’s display is likely a standard LCD, prioritizing cost savings over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image clarity. The Moto G05’s camera capabilities are likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the G05 will hinder low-light photography and video recording. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, offering features like 4K recording and advanced stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, built on a 5nm process, features a tri-cluster configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture, combined with the 5nm fabrication, delivers significantly higher processing power and efficiency compared to the Moto G05’s MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme (12nm). The G05’s octa-core CPU (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding games or multitasking. The Tensor G2’s integrated AI capabilities also enhance features like voice recognition and image processing, areas where the G05 will fall behind.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G05 claims an impressive 60:22h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. This is likely achieved through a combination of a large battery capacity (unspecified) and the power efficiency of the Helio G81 Extreme. The Pixel 7a, with a reported 76h endurance rating, also offers respectable battery life, but falls short of the G05’s longevity. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 7a adds the convenience of 7.5W wireless charging and supports PD3.0 for faster wired charging speeds. The G05’s 1000 cycle battery claim suggests a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G05 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and prioritize battery life above all else. You’ll appreciate its affordability and dependable performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a best-in-class camera, a fluid user experience powered by Google’s Tensor G2, and features like wireless charging and a brighter, more vibrant display. You’re willing to trade some battery life for a more premium overall experience.