Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) vs. TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) and the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G smartphone market. The Motorola prioritizes performance and productivity with its integrated stylus, while the TCL focuses on eye comfort and a unique display experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset and 68W charging significantly outperform the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G’s Dimensity 6020 and 15W charging, making it ideal for demanding tasks and minimizing downtime.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 711, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, April 082023, August 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 17Available. Released 2023, October
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame-
Dimensions162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in)164.5 x 75.4 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + eSIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight191 g (6.74 oz)192 g (6.77 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3-
Resolution1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak)LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm)
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 15, up to 2 major Android upgradesAndroid 13, TCL UI
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM256GB 6GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos)Yes
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging68W wired 15W wireless15W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the WebStarlight Black
ModelsXT2517-1T771K
Price$ 299.99 / C$ 368.17About 250 EUR

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)

  • Significantly faster charging (68W)
  • More powerful processor (Snapdragon 6 Gen 3)
  • Brighter display for outdoor visibility

  • Stylus may not be useful for all users
  • Potentially larger and heavier due to stylus integration

TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G

  • Unique NxtPaper display for eye comfort
  • Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful processor
  • More affordable price point (likely)

  • Significantly slower charging (15W)
  • Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
  • Dimmer display for outdoor use

Display Comparison

The TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G boasts a unique selling point with its 'NxtPaper' display, achieving a high 1892:1 contrast ratio. However, its 611 nits of peak brightness falls significantly short of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s measured 1870 nits. This means the Motorola will be far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the TCL aims for a paper-like experience, the Motorola’s higher brightness provides a more vibrant and versatile viewing experience. The TCL's focus is clearly on reducing eye strain, but at the cost of overall visual pop.

Camera Comparison

Neither device is positioned as a camera powerhouse, but the available data suggests a slight edge to the Motorola. While specific sensor details are missing, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities are generally stronger on Qualcomm platforms. The TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G likely relies heavily on software processing to compensate for its less powerful chipset. Given the market segment, focusing on the primary sensor performance is key, and the Motorola’s chipset suggests better image quality in most scenarios. We'd advise ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices.

Performance

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This is a substantial upgrade over the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7nm), which uses a 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Motorola will handle demanding apps and games with greater ease.

Battery Life

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) achieves an impressive 10:05 hours of active use, demonstrating excellent battery optimization despite its powerful processor. While the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, its less demanding chipset likely contributes to reasonable endurance. However, the Motorola’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, offering significantly faster top-ups compared to the TCL’s 15W charging. The Motorola also adds 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the TCL, providing added convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you need a phone for multitasking, gaming, or frequent note-taking with the integrated stylus, and value fast charging speeds. Buy the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G if you prioritize eye comfort, enjoy reading on a paper-like display, and are less concerned with raw processing power or rapid charging.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) offer a noticeable performance improvement over the Dimensity 6020 in the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G for gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s more powerful CPU and GPU, combined with its 4nm process, provide a significant performance boost for gaming. You can expect higher frame rates, smoother gameplay, and better sustained performance in demanding titles on the Motorola, while the TCL may struggle with more graphically intensive games.
❓ How does the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G’s NxtPaper display compare to a traditional LCD or OLED in terms of blue light emission and eye strain?
The NxtPaper display is designed to mimic the texture of paper and significantly reduce blue light emission compared to traditional LCD or OLED screens. This is achieved through a combination of hardware and software optimizations, aiming to minimize eye strain during prolonged reading or use. However, the trade-off is reduced color vibrancy and lower peak brightness.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the TCL 40 NxtPaper 5G slow enough to be a major inconvenience in daily use?
Yes, 15W charging is considerably slower than the 68W charging on the Motorola. Expect significantly longer charging times – potentially over 2 hours for a full charge. This could be a major inconvenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.