Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 13:27h active use battery life outweighs the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s faster 68W charging and brighter display, offering a more reliable all-day experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 08 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 17 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | XT2517-1 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use (1870 nits)
- Extremely fast 68W wired charging
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and navigation
- Shorter battery life (10:05h active use)
- Potentially less refined camera system
- Slightly slower CPU clock speeds
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional battery life (13:27h active use)
- Potentially better CPU performance with Exynos 1480
- Likely superior camera image processing
- Lower peak display brightness (1010 nits)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Lacks integrated stylus functionality
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1870 nits, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55’s 1010 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight for the Motorola. However, the A55 likely employs Samsung’s excellent color calibration and viewing angles, which aren’t specified in the data. The lack of information on panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED) for either device makes a deeper analysis difficult, but the Motorola’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Galaxy A55 will likely feature a more sophisticated camera system with better image processing. The Motorola’s focus on stylus functionality may indicate a prioritization of other features over camera prowess. We can assume both phones will include a standard wide and ultrawide lens, but the A55 is more likely to have optical image stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor, improving low-light performance and video stability.
Performance
Both phones utilize a 4nm process, indicating a focus on efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480, with its 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, has a clock speed advantage over the Motorola’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78). This suggests the A55 will offer slightly better performance in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 is known for its efficient architecture, potentially mitigating the clock speed difference in real-world usage. The absence of GPU details prevents a complete performance assessment, but the Exynos 1480 likely holds a modest edge in graphics.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Samsung Galaxy A55 truly shines. Its active use score of 13:27h significantly surpasses the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)’s 10:05h. While the Motorola compensates with 68W wired charging (and 15W wireless), allowing for a quicker top-up, the A55’s superior efficiency means fewer trips to the charger. The A55’s 25W charging, while slower, is still adequate for overnight charging and won’t strain the battery as much as consistently utilizing 68W fast charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you frequently take notes, sketch, or navigate with a stylus and value the convenience of extremely fast 68W charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a refined software experience, and a consistently bright, though less peak-bright, display for outdoor visibility.