Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023) vs. Moto G62 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G62 5G edges out the Stylus (2023) thanks to its brighter display, more efficient chipset, and 5G connectivity. While the Stylus offers a stylus and larger screen, the G62 5G provides a more polished overall experience for the price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023) | Motorola Moto G62 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 02 | 2022, June 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 05 | Available. Released 2022, June 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.1 x 9.2 mm (6.41 x 2.92 x 0.36 in) | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Stylus Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Rose Gold | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 1571:1 contrast ratio, 552 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023)
- Larger Display (6.6-inch)
- Integrated Stylus
- Potentially more versatile camera setup (speculative)
- Less efficient chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Lower display brightness
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Brighter Display (552 nits)
- More efficient Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset
- 5G Connectivity
- Excellent Battery Life (122h endurance)
- Smaller Display (6.5-inch)
- No Stylus Support
Display Comparison
The Moto G62 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality. Its measured 552 nits of peak brightness is noticeably higher than what's typically seen on the Stylus (2023), making it easier to view outdoors. Both offer a 1571:1 contrast ratio, indicating excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Stylus (2023) has a larger 6.6-inch display versus the G62 5G's 6.5-inch, which may be preferable for some.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable between the two, though specifics are missing. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance may be a weakness on both devices. The Stylus (2023) might offer slightly more versatility with its camera setup, potentially including a macro lens, but this is speculative.
Performance
The Snapdragon 480+ 5G in the Moto G62 5G is generally more efficient and offers slightly better performance than the Helio G85 in the Stylus (2023). The 8nm process of the Snapdragon chip contributes to better power efficiency. While both handle everyday tasks well, the G62 5G will feel snappier when multitasking or running more demanding apps. The G62 5G also supports 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Stylus (2023).
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. Real-world usage will vary, but users can expect all-day battery performance from either device. The Snapdragon 480+ 5G's efficiency in the G62 5G might give it a slight edge in longevity.
Buying Guide
The Moto G Stylus (2023) is ideal for users who prioritize note-taking, sketching, or general stylus interaction. It's also a good choice if you prefer a larger display for media consumption. The Moto G62 5G is best suited for those seeking a smooth, 5G-enabled experience with a vibrant display and solid battery life, without needing a stylus.