Motorola Moto G Stylus 2022 vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G edges out the Moto G Stylus 2022 thanks to its faster 5G connectivity, brighter display, and significantly quicker charging. While the Stylus offers a unique pen, the A23 5G provides a more polished and modern experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Stylus (2022) | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 03 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 17 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.2 x 75.9 x 9.5 mm (6.70 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 216 g (7.62 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Stylus Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Twilight Blue, Metallic Rose | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | $ 90.99 | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2022)
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Brighter Display
- 5G Connectivity
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Generally better camera quality
- Stylus not included (if desired)
- Design may be less appealing to some
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Integrated Stylus
- Large Display
- Good Battery Life
- Affordable Price
- Slower Performance (Helio G88)
- Slower Charging (10W)
- Less Bright Display
- Camera not as refined
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G boasts a brighter display (508 nits vs. Moto G Stylus's likely around 400-450 nits, estimated) and a slightly more modern panel. While both offer a 1328:1 contrast ratio, the A23 5G's higher brightness makes it more enjoyable to use outdoors. The Moto G Stylus's larger size might appeal to some, but the A23 5G's visual clarity is a step up.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable cameras, but the Galaxy A23 5G generally produces more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in good lighting. The A23 5G's image processing tends to be more refined. Low-light performance is also slightly better on the A23 5G. The Moto G Stylus's camera is decent, but not a standout.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Galaxy A23 5G provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Helio G88 in the Moto G Stylus 2022. Apps launch faster, multitasking is smoother, and gaming is more responsive on the A23 5G. The 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 138 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Galaxy A23 5G's 25W charging is significantly faster than the Moto G Stylus's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2022) is ideal for users who prioritize note-taking, sketching, or general stylus input. It's a good choice if you value a large screen and don't mind slower charging. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is better suited for those seeking a smoother, faster experience with 5G connectivity, a vibrant display, and quicker charging speeds.