Moto G Pro vs Redmi Note 10 Pro: A Clash of Efficiency and Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained usage and value, the Motorola Moto G Pro emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 88-hour battery life and respectable display are hard to ignore. However, power users and gamers will find the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100 a compelling upgrade.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, June 15 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Stylus Water-repellent coating | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic indigo | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | XT2043-7 | - |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1422:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 173611 (v8) GeekBench: 1385 (v5.1) GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G Pro
- Exceptional 88-hour battery life
- Respectable 1422:1 contrast ratio
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Snapdragon 665 struggles with demanding tasks
- Slow 15W charging
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (0-100% in 42 mins)
- 6nm process for improved efficiency
- Likely shorter battery life than Moto G Pro
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Moto G Pro features a display capable of 642 nits of peak brightness and a 1422:1 contrast ratio, providing a reasonably vibrant viewing experience. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, leaving a gap in direct comparison. Given Xiaomi’s typical display quality in this segment, it’s likely to offer similar or better brightness and contrast. The Moto G Pro’s contrast ratio is a strong point, suggesting deep blacks, but without knowing the panel technology (AMOLED vs. IPS) of the Redmi Note 10 Pro, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the Redmi Note 10 Pro likely features a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and more sophisticated software algorithms. The Moto G Pro’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but will likely fall short in low-light conditions compared to a more modern sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, a 11nm process chip with an octa-core CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This is a capable chip for everyday tasks but will struggle with graphically intensive games. Conversely, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1100, built on a more efficient 6nm process, and featuring an octa-core CPU (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a substantial performance leap, making it significantly better suited for gaming and multitasking. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Pro shines with an impressive endurance rating of 88 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. This is achieved with a battery size not specified, but optimized by the power-efficient Snapdragon 665. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, while not specifying battery capacity, compensates with incredibly fast 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 42 minutes. This rapid charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery, but it doesn’t negate the Moto G Pro’s superior overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G Pro if you need a phone that reliably lasts through multiple days on a single charge and value long-term usability over peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and fast charging, and are willing to accept a shorter battery life in exchange for significantly improved processing power.