Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. Motorola Moto G Pro: Which Budget Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging and longer 119-hour endurance rating outweigh the Moto G Pro’s potentially lower price. The Snapdragon 695 also provides a noticeable performance boost, making the Poco X4 Pro 5G a more future-proof option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Pro | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, June 15 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Stylus Water-repellent coating | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic indigo | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | XT2043-7 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1422:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 173611 (v8) GeekBench: 1385 (v5.1) GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Respectable battery endurance (88h)
- Familiar Motorola software experience
- Slow 15W charging
- Older Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Less future-proof 4G connectivity
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Longer battery life (119h endurance)
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Contrast ratio is 'Infinite' (nominal) - actual performance varies
Display Comparison
The Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts a 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting a VA-type panel optimized for deep blacks, while the Moto G Pro’s 1422:1 contrast ratio indicates an IPS LCD. While the Moto G Pro delivers a measured 642 nits of peak brightness, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s specifications don’t provide brightness data, but Xiaomi typically prioritizes good visibility. The lack of high refresh rate information for both devices suggests a standard 60Hz experience, focusing on efficiency rather than fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s positioning as a more feature-rich device, it’s reasonable to expect a more capable camera system, potentially with larger sensors and improved image processing algorithms. The Moto G Pro likely focuses on basic photography needs, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G may offer more versatility.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G Pro’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance. The CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver in the Poco X4 Pro 5G versus 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver in the Moto G Pro – further favors the Poco, offering faster processing speeds for demanding tasks. The 5G modem in the Poco X4 Pro 5G is also a key advantage for future network compatibility.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G dominates in battery performance with an endurance rating of 119 hours, compared to the Moto G Pro’s 88 hours. This difference is further amplified by the charging capabilities: the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the Moto G Pro is limited to a slower 15W wired charge. This means the Poco X4 Pro 5G can quickly top up its battery, minimizing downtime, while the Moto G Pro requires significantly longer to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G Pro if your primary concern is maximizing talk time and you prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost, accepting slower charging and a less powerful processor. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, extended battery life, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.