Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Motorola Moto G Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a significantly faster and more responsive experience than the Moto G Pro’s Snapdragon 665, and the 25W charging is a welcome upgrade. While the Moto G Pro boasts impressive battery life, the A52s 5G’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Pro | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, June 15 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Stylus Water-repellent coating | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic indigo | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | XT2043-7 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 320 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1422:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 173611 (v8) GeekBench: 1385 (v5.1) GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (88h)
- High peak display brightness (642 nits)
- Good contrast ratio (1422:1)
- Outdated Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slow 15W charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Fast 25W wired charging
- Excellent battery life (113h)
- Lower peak display brightness (800 nits)
- Contrast ratio is a marketing term ('Infinite')
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and Motorola Moto G Pro present contrasting display experiences. The A52s 5G, while listed with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), delivers a measured 800 nits of peak brightness, which is lower than the Moto G Pro’s impressive 642 nits. However, the A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s superior color calibration and panel technology. The Moto G Pro’s 1422:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks, but the older chipset may limit its ability to dynamically adjust brightness for optimal viewing in all conditions. The A52s 5G’s display is likely to be more vibrant and responsive due to the more powerful processing capabilities driving it.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A52s 5G’s more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Moto G Pro’s older chipset will struggle to keep up with the computational photography demands of modern smartphone cameras. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A52s 5G, a common feature in this price range, would further enhance image quality and video stabilization, something the Moto G Pro may lack.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a significant leap forward from the Motorola Moto G Pro’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the Moto G Pro’s Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the A52s 5G. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Motorola Moto G Pro shines, boasting an endurance rating of 88 hours. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G isn’t far behind at 113 hours, but the difference is notable. However, the A52s 5G compensates with significantly faster 25W wired charging, allowing for a much quicker top-up compared to the Moto G Pro’s 15W charging. While the Moto G Pro will last longer on a single charge, the A52s 5G’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering more convenience for users who frequently need to recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G Pro if your absolute priority is maximizing battery life and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and appreciate faster charging and a more modern feature set.