Motorola Moto G Pro vs. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Deep Dive into Value and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency, the Moto G Pro remains a compelling choice due to its impressive 88-hour endurance rating. However, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner for those demanding faster performance and quicker charging, despite a shorter battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Pro | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, June 15 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Stylus Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic indigo | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | XT2043-7 | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1422:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 173611 (v8) GeekBench: 1385 (v5.1) GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G Pro
- Exceptional battery life (88h endurance)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Outdated chipset (Snapdragon 665)
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Dimmer display compared to the newer model
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 6 Gen 3)
- Significantly brighter display (1870 nits)
- Rapid charging (68W wired, 15W wireless)
- Shorter battery life (10:05h active use)
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more heat under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1870 nits compared to the Moto G Pro’s 642 nits. This translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays share a similar contrast ratio around the 1400:1 mark, the brightness difference is the defining factor. The newer device likely benefits from advancements in panel technology, though specifics like refresh rate are not provided. The G Pro's display, while adequate, will appear dim in comparison.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, given the market positioning, it's reasonable to assume the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) benefits from improved image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. The lack of sensor size information prevents a definitive comparison, but the newer chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely deliver better dynamic range and low-light performance. The G Pro's camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the G Stylus 5G should offer a noticeable step up in image quality.
Performance
The chipset upgrade is the most substantial difference between these two phones. The Moto G Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) is a capable processor for everyday tasks, but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm). This newer chip, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a substantial performance boost, evidenced by its octa-core configuration featuring faster Cortex-A78 cores (2.4 GHz vs 2.0 GHz). The 4nm node also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. Users will experience snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the G Stylus 5G.
Battery Life
The Moto G Pro’s 88-hour endurance rating is its standout feature. This suggests a highly optimized power consumption profile. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), while offering a respectable 10:05 hours of active use, falls short of the G Pro’s longevity. However, the G Stylus 5G compensates with significantly faster charging: 68W wired and 15W wireless, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the G Pro’s 15W wired charging. This trade-off – longer runtime versus faster refueling – is central to the decision-making process.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use and value long-term battery health. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prioritize a responsive user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of 68W wired and 15W wireless charging, even if it means charging more frequently.