Motorola Moto G Power vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R: A Detailed Comparison of Budget Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Moto G Power’s Snapdragon 665, while also providing faster 18W charging. While the Moto G Power still boasts solid battery life, the Redmi Note 12R’s efficiency and speed make it the more compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G Power | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 07. Released 2020, April 17 | 2023, June 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, June 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.8 x 9.6 mm (6.30 x 2.98 x 0.38 in) | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Smoke Black | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | XT2041DL | 23076RA4BC |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
Motorola Moto G Power
- Potentially larger battery capacity (based on historical Moto G Power models)
- Proven reliability and software support from Motorola
- Lower price point (potentially)
- Older, less efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Less responsive user experience
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R
- More efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset (4nm)
- Faster 18W charging with Power Delivery
- Improved performance for multitasking and gaming
- More modern processor architecture
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs necessitates focusing on the chipset impact on UI smoothness. The Redmi Note 12R’s more powerful GPU, paired with the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, will contribute to a more fluid scrolling experience and potentially better graphics rendering, even if the resolution and refresh rate are similar.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The newer Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Redmi Note 12R likely features a more advanced ISP, enabling better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors, the Redmi Note 12R’s processing capabilities will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both will struggle with low-light photography, but the Redmi Note 12R has the edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G Power utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), an older architecture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R boasts the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm). This process node difference is critical; 4nm is significantly more efficient, translating to better performance per watt and reduced thermal throttling. The Redmi Note 12R’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 – also represents a step up in core architecture compared to the Moto G Power’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver. This means the Redmi Note 12R will handle demanding apps and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Moto G Power is historically known for its large battery capacity, but without specific mAh figures for both devices, we must focus on efficiency. The Redmi Note 12R’s 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is demonstrably more power-efficient than the Moto G Power’s 11nm Snapdragon 665. This means the Redmi Note 12R will likely achieve comparable, if not better, real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. Furthermore, the Redmi Note 12R supports 18W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), significantly faster than the Moto G Power’s 10W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time, a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G Power if your absolute priority is maximizing battery life above all else and you're on a very tight budget. It's a reliable workhorse for basic tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12R if you value a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a more modern chipset, even if it means slightly less extreme battery endurance. It's ideal for users who multitask or enjoy occasional gaming.