Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs. Motorola One 5G UW Ace: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G 5G Plus edges out the One 5G UW Ace thanks to its superior chipset and significantly better battery life. While the One 5G UW Ace offers UW capabilities, the G 5G Plus provides a more well-rounded and powerful experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | Motorola one 5G UW ace |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - Verizon, USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 | 2021, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, July 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) | 166.1 x 76 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 213.5 g (7.51 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Unspecified |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac | Volcanic Gray |
| Models | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.4 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Superior Chipset (Snapdragon 765 5G)
- Exceptional Battery Life (114h Endurance)
- Higher Display Brightness (543 nits)
- Potentially Better Camera System
- Design may be slightly dated
- Charging speed is standard (20W)
Motorola one 5G UW ace
- UW 5G Connectivity
- Potentially Lower Price
- Decent Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Weaker Chipset (Snapdragon 750G 5G)
- Shorter Battery Life
- Lower Display Brightness
- Less Powerful Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) but the Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured contrast ratio of 1269:1, suggesting potentially richer blacks and better image quality. Brightness is also higher on the Moto G 5G Plus at 543 nits compared to the One 5G UW Ace's likely average for the era. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both, but the Moto G 5G Plus may have a slightly more vibrant display.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed for either device, but the Moto G 5G Plus likely has a more versatile camera system. Both likely feature a main sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Image processing and software optimization are crucial, and Motorola's software has historically been decent but not exceptional. Expect similar overall image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Moto G 5G Plus might offer slightly better low-light performance.
Performance
The Moto G 5G Plus holds a clear advantage here. Its Snapdragon 765 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 750G 5G in the One 5G UW Ace. The 765G's architecture and higher clock speeds translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The 7nm process also contributes to better efficiency.
Battery Life
The Moto G 5G Plus absolutely dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 114 hours is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer usage between charges compared to the One 5G UW Ace. While the One 5G UW Ace's battery capacity is likely similar, the less efficient chipset impacts its longevity.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and a slightly more premium feel. The Motorola One 5G UW Ace is a good choice for those specifically needing UW 5G connectivity and are on a tighter budget, accepting slightly lower performance.