Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs. Moto G 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G 5G edges out the Plus with significantly better battery life and a slightly improved display. While the Plus boasts a more powerful chipset, the G 5G's longer endurance and vibrant screen make it the more compelling option for most users seeking a budget 5G phone.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | Motorola Moto G 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 | Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -28.4 LUFS (Average) | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 765G)
- Slightly brighter display (543 nits)
- Generally better for gaming
- Shorter battery life (114h)
- Potentially higher price
- Performance gains may not be noticeable in everyday use
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Exceptional battery life (131h)
- Slightly better display brightness (484 nits)
- Generally better value for money
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 750G)
- May struggle with demanding games
- Camera performance is comparable but not exceptional
Display Comparison
The Moto G 5G takes a slight lead in the display department. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1269:1 vs 1419:1), the G 5G's peak brightness of 484 nits is marginally better than the Plus's 543 nits, resulting in a more vibrant viewing experience, especially outdoors. Both utilize similar screen technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolutions, ensuring sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two. Both phones feature a triple-camera system, but specific sensor details are often similar. Image quality in well-lit conditions should be quite similar, with both capable of capturing decent photos and videos. Low-light performance is likely to be a weak point on both devices, typical for this price range. Software processing plays a significant role here, and Motorola's approach is generally reliable.
Performance
The Moto G 5G Plus holds a performance advantage thanks to its Snapdragon 765G chipset. This chip is generally faster and more capable than the Snapdragon 750G in the G 5G, particularly for gaming and multitasking. However, in everyday use, the difference might not be immediately noticeable. The Plus also has a slightly more complex CPU configuration.
Battery Life
The Moto G 5G shines in battery life. Its endurance rating of 131 hours significantly surpasses the Plus's 114 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage between charges, making the G 5G a more practical choice for users who prioritize longevity.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus? Users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming or demanding apps might find the Plus appealing. Who should buy the Motorola Moto G 5G? Those prioritizing battery life, a slightly better display, and overall value will likely prefer the G 5G.