Motorola Showdown: Moto G 5G Plus vs. Edge 30 Neo
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 30 Neo wins thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more modern chipset. While the Moto G 5G Plus boasts impressive battery endurance, the Edge 30 Neo's overall package offers a more premium and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.4 LUFS (Average) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Excellent battery life
- Large display
- Good value for money
- Decent camera
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
- Less premium design
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Fast charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- Brighter display
- More modern chipset
- Sleek design
- Vibrant camera
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Potentially higher price
- Nominal 'Infinite' contrast ratio
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 Neo's display is a clear winner. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits compared to the Moto G 5G Plus's 543 nits, making it significantly easier to see outdoors. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1269:1 for the G 5G Plus and 'Infinite' for the Edge 30 Neo, which is a nominal value), the Edge 30 Neo's brightness advantage is undeniable. The Edge 30 Neo also features a slightly smaller, more modern OLED panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Edge 30 Neo generally produces more vibrant and detailed images. The Moto G 5G Plus's camera is decent, but the Edge 30 Neo's image processing tends to be more refined. Low-light performance is also slightly better on the Edge 30 Neo. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
The Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Moto G 5G Plus's Snapdragon 765 5G. The newer 6nm process allows for better power management, and the architecture improvements provide a smoother overall experience, especially in demanding apps and games. While both phones offer adequate performance for everyday tasks, the Edge 30 Neo handles multitasking and heavier workloads with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Moto G 5G Plus holds a slight edge in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 114 hours compared to the Edge 30 Neo's 104 hours. However, this advantage is largely offset by the Edge 30 Neo's incredibly fast 68W wired charging, which can fully charge the battery in under 30 minutes. The Edge 30 Neo also supports 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Moto G 5G Plus.
Buying Guide
The Moto G 5G Plus is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing long battery life and a large display. The Edge 30 Neo is a better choice for those seeking faster performance, quicker charging, and a more vibrant screen, even if it means sacrificing a bit of battery longevity.