Motorola Moto G (2025) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G (2025) is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a performance edge over the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s Helio G99 Ultra, despite the latter’s impressive battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G (2025) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 7, 12, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 14 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 30 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.1 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm (6.58 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Gray, Sapphire Blue | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | XT2513V, T2513-1 | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | $ 149.99 | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G (2025)
- More modern and efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely to receive more software updates
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Battery life likely inferior to Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Exceptional battery life (11:36h active use)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (full charge in 46 minutes)
- Bright 1047 nit display
- Older Helio G99 Ultra chipset
- Potentially lower sustained performance
- May not receive as many software updates
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1047 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor use under direct sunlight. While the Moto G (2025) display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s brightness level suggests an IPS LCD panel optimized for high visibility, whereas the Moto G may rely on software optimizations to compensate for a potentially less powerful panel. The absence of refresh rate data for both phones makes it difficult to assess smoothness, but the Redmi’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s mention of 'Photo / Video' suggests a focus on versatile camera capabilities. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. It’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G will feature a higher megapixel count, a common trend in the Redmi Note series. The Moto G (2025) will likely prioritize computational photography to enhance image quality, but without further details, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G likely has the edge in raw camera hardware.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G (2025) is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This chipset’s 6nm fabrication process provides improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra. The Helio G99 Ultra, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is a capable performer, but the Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture and more efficient node should translate to better sustained performance in demanding tasks and gaming. The Dimensity 6300’s architecture will likely offer a slight edge in multi-core tasks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G excels in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 11 hours and 36 minutes. This is a significant advantage over what we might expect from the Moto G (2025), given its lack of specified battery capacity. Furthermore, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G supports 67W wired charging, enabling a 50% charge in just 16 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes. The Moto G (2025) is limited to 30W charging, meaning it will take considerably longer to fully replenish its battery. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s charging speed and endurance are key strengths for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G (2025) if you need a phone that can handle demanding apps and multitasking with relative ease, and you value a more modern chipset for potential software updates. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you prioritize all-day battery life, exceptionally fast charging, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.