Motorola Moto G (2025) vs. Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus emerges as the stronger contender. Its more powerful Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset, significantly brighter display, and faster 50W charging outweigh the Moto G (2025)'s potential cost savings. However, the Moto G remains a viable option for those prioritizing absolute affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G (2025) | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 7, 12, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 14 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 30 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.1 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm (6.58 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Gray, Sapphire Blue | Black, Grey |
| Models | XT2513V, T2513-1 | A142P |
| Price | $ 149.99 | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
Motorola Moto G (2025)
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset for everyday tasks
- Likely to offer a clean Android experience
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Likely a less vibrant display
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Faster Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset for smoother performance
- Significantly brighter display (1097 nits)
- Rapid 50W charging (0-100% in 56 minutes)
- Excellent battery life (16:34h active use)
- Higher price compared to the Moto G (2025)
- Nothing OS may not appeal to all users
- Design may be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a clear advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1097 nits. This is a substantial leap over what we'd expect from the Moto G (2025), which lacks specific brightness data but typically falls in the 400-600 nit range for its price bracket. The higher brightness of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus translates to superior visibility outdoors and a more immersive viewing experience. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Nothing Phone's brightness suggests a more advanced panel with potentially better color accuracy and contrast. We anticipate the Moto G (2025) will have larger bezels, given its cost constraints.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Moto G (2025), it's difficult to make a direct comparison. However, given its price point, we can expect a more basic camera setup. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. The aperture and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) are key factors, and the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is expected to have an advantage in low-light photography. We'd caution against placing too much emphasis on secondary sensors (like 2MP macros) on either device, as their image quality is often limited.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Motorola Moto G (2025) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus features the Dimensity 7350 Pro (4nm). The 4nm process node of the 7350 Pro is inherently more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The CPU architecture also favors the Nothing Phone, with its Cortex-A715 cores (clocked at 3.0 GHz) offering a significant performance uplift compared to the Moto G’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.4 GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus. While both phones feature 6x Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz for efficiency, the overall system performance will be noticeably quicker on the Nothing Phone.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus demonstrates a clear advantage in charging speed, supporting 50W wired charging, reaching 50% in 21 minutes and 100% in 56 minutes. The Moto G (2025) is limited to 30W charging, resulting in a significantly longer charge time. While the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus also boasts an impressive active use battery score of 16:34h, the faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery life. The actual mAh capacity of the Moto G (2025) is unknown, but the faster charging and longer active use time of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus suggest a more optimized power management system.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G (2025) if you need a reliable smartphone for basic tasks, prioritize a lower upfront cost, and aren't heavily invested in demanding applications or gaming. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you prefer a smoother user experience, a more vibrant display for media consumption, and the convenience of rapid charging, even if it means spending a bit more.