Motorola Moto G (2024) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a vibrant display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Moto G (2024)'s Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 and 18W charging, justifying the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G (2024) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 7, 12, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 12 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 21 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sage Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | XT2417-4, XT2417-1 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | $ 59.03 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G (2024)
- Clean software experience
- Potentially longer software support
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Dimmer display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Brighter and sharper display
- More powerful processor
- MIUI software can be bloated
- Potentially shorter software support
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1283 nits, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight compared to the Moto G (2024), which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be considerably dimmer given its market positioning. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s higher peak brightness and potentially higher PWM dimming rate (speculation based on Xiaomi's recent offerings) will be more appealing to users sensitive to flicker. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also benefits from a higher resolution, contributing to a sharper image.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Moto G (2024), a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a higher-resolution main sensor and advanced image processing capabilities. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s focus on camera features, common in Xiaomi's Redmi Note series, suggests a greater emphasis on photography than the Moto G (2024), which typically prioritizes core functionality. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to offer better low-light performance and more versatile shooting modes.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, fabricated on a more efficient 4nm process, offering a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G (2024)'s Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6nm). The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s Cortex-A715 cores, clocked at 2.8 GHz, provide a noticeable uplift in CPU performance compared to the Moto G’s Cortex-A78 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+. While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is geared towards more demanding users.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ excels in charging speed with its 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Moto G (2024)'s 18W charging, which will take significantly longer to fully replenish the battery. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ achieves an active use score of 10:38h, the faster charging mitigates concerns about battery life, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The Moto G (2024) will likely rely on overnight charging due to its slower charging rate.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G (2024) if you need a dependable daily driver with a clean software experience and prioritize long-term software support over raw performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a more feature-rich experience, demand incredibly fast charging, and enjoy a brighter, more visually engaging display for media consumption.