The Motorola Moto G (2022) and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Moto G (2022)'s 10W, and the higher peak brightness makes it more usable outdoors. However, the Moto G (2022) remains a viable option for those seeking a simpler experience and potentially longer software support from Motorola.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 22 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 19 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 75.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Gray | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | XT2213, XT2213-3 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | $ 65.00 | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G (2022)
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially faster software updates
- More compact design (likely)
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging
- Brighter 746 nit display
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- MIUI software customization (can be polarizing)
- Potentially slower software updates
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, where the Moto G (2022)'s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a lower peak brightness. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher brightness translates to a more enjoyable viewing experience in direct sunlight. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Redmi, typical of IPS panels, but the brightness difference is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience, potentially with better image processing algorithms. The Moto G (2022) likely focuses on simplicity, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G may offer more features and shooting modes. It's important to note that the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this price range offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Motorola Moto G (2022) uses the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm), while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance. Both CPUs feature a similar core configuration – 2x high-performance cores and 6x efficiency cores – but the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores (2.2 GHz) are architecturally more advanced than the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to a slight edge for the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in demanding tasks and gaming. The lack of LPDDR5x RAM specification for either device suggests both likely use LPDDR4x, limiting memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Motorola Moto G (2022) is limited to a slow 10W wired charge, requiring several hours for a full charge. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 standards, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. This rapid charging capability is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G (2022) if you prioritize a clean Android experience, potentially faster software updates, and a more compact form factor. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and don't mind Xiaomi's MIUI software customization.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G powerful enough for demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it provides a playable experience for casual gamers. The Dimensity 700 in the Moto G (2022) will offer similar performance, but the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 may lead to slightly better sustained performance during longer gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G compared to the 10W charging on the Moto G (2022)?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The Moto G (2022)'s 10W charging will take several hours to fully charge the battery, making it inconvenient for users who need a quick top-up. This is arguably the biggest differentiator between the two devices.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's MIUI software have a lot of bloatware?
MIUI is known for including pre-installed apps (bloatware). While Xiaomi has reduced the amount of bloatware in recent versions, you may still find some unwanted apps. Fortunately, many of these can be uninstalled or disabled. The Motorola Moto G (2022) offers a much cleaner Android experience with minimal pre-installed apps.
