Choosing a new Android phone can be overwhelming. The Motorola Moto G (2022) offers a budget-friendly option, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a mid-range powerhouse. Let's break down these two contenders to help you decide which one deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner, offering a superior display, significantly faster performance thanks to the Exynos 1380, a better camera system, and faster charging. While the Moto G 2022 is more affordable, the A54 provides a much more premium and feature-rich experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 22 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 19 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 75.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Gray | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | XT2213, XT2213-3 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | $ 65.00 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G (2022)
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Clean Android experience
- Water-repellent design
- Underpowered chipset
- Mediocre display
- Slow charging (10W)
- Basic camera
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent display
- Powerful processor
- Great camera system
- Long battery life
- Fast charging (25W)
- Premium design
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- More expensive
- Samsung's One UI can be divisive
- No charger included in the box
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits vs. likely around 450-500 nits on the Moto G 2022) with a superior contrast ratio (Infinite vs. typical). The A54's display is also likely to have better color accuracy and viewing angles. The Moto G 2022's display is adequate for everyday use but lacks the vibrancy and clarity of the A54.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is considerably better. While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the A54 likely has a higher resolution main sensor, improved image processing, and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). Expect better low-light performance and overall image quality from the A54.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a substantial upgrade over the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Moto G 2022. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A54. The Dimensity 700 is sufficient for basic tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating exceptional endurance (119h endurance rating). The Moto G 2022 also provides solid battery life, but the A54's larger battery and more efficient chipset give it an edge.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G (2022) is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize affordability and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great display, capable camera, and long battery life, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Moto G 2022 good for gaming?
The Moto G 2022 can handle basic games, but it will struggle with more demanding titles. The Galaxy A54 is a much better choice for gamers.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung typically provides longer software update support than Motorola. Expect more Android version updates and security patches on the Galaxy A54.