The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Motorola Moto G (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one truly delivers the best value? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G edges out the Moto G 2022 thanks to its brighter display, slightly faster chipset (depending on variant), and faster charging. However, the Moto G might appeal to those prioritizing Motorola's near-stock Android experience and potentially a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 22 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 19 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 75.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Gray | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | XT2213, XT2213-3 | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | $ 65.00 | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G (2022)
- Clean Android experience
- Simple and user-friendly
- Potentially lower price
- Dimmer display
- Slower charging
- Less powerful camera
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (15W)
- Generally better camera
- 5G connectivity
- Samsung's One UI (can be polarizing)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G boasts a significant advantage with its measured 519 nits max brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. While both have a nominal contrast ratio of 1334:1, the A14's brightness provides a more vibrant and usable viewing experience. The Moto G 2022's display is adequate but noticeably dimmer.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is a key differentiator. While both offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Galaxy A14 5G generally delivers better image processing and more consistent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Moto G 2022's camera is serviceable but lacks the refinement of the A14. Specific megapixel counts and features are not provided, but Samsung's image processing typically shines.
Performance
Performance is nuanced. The Galaxy A14 5G (SM-A146B variant) utilizes the Exynos 1330, generally offering a slight performance edge over the Moto G 2022's Dimensity 700. The SM-A146P variant uses the Dimensity 700, making the performance comparison more even. Both CPUs feature octa-core designs, but the A14's Cortex-A78 cores provide a boost in single-core performance. Day-to-day tasks are handled well on both devices.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A14 5G claims an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Moto G 2022's battery life is good, but likely falls short of the A14's longevity. The A14's 15W charging is also faster than the Moto G's 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G (2022) is ideal for users who prefer a clean Android experience, value simplicity, and don't need the absolute best performance. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is a better choice for those prioritizing a brighter display, faster charging, and a more feature-rich Samsung experience, especially if 5G connectivity is a must.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is expected to have significantly better battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 130 hours.
❓ Is the Moto G 2022 worth buying if I prefer a clean Android experience?
Yes, the Moto G 2022 is a solid choice if you prioritize a near-stock Android experience and don't need the absolute best performance or camera capabilities.
