Moto E7 vs. Pixel 4a 5G: Which Budget Phone Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth experience, better camera capabilities, and 5G connectivity, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is the clear winner. While the Moto E7 offers exceptional value for basic tasks, the Snapdragon 765G in the Pixel 4a 5G provides a significantly more responsive and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto E7 | Google Pixel 4a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6, mmWave (market dependant) |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Asia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 24. Released 2020, December 09 | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.7 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 153.9 x 74 x 8.2 mm (Sub-6) or 8.5 mm (Sub-6 and mmWave) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 168 g (5G Sub-6); 171 g ( 5G Sub-6 and mmWave) (5.93 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 107˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3885 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mineral Gray, Aqua Blue, Satin Coral | Just Black, Clearly White |
| Models | - | GD1YQ, G025I, G025E, G025H, G6QU3 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 140 EUR |
Motorola Moto E7
- Extremely affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding hardware
- Simple and straightforward Android experience
- Significantly slower performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited 5G connectivity
Google Pixel 4a 5G
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Superior camera quality with Google’s image processing
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Faster charging with PD2.0
- Higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Moto E7 (though optimized)
- May receive fewer software updates than other Pixel devices
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like brightness in nits) are unavailable for the Moto E7, its market positioning suggests a standard LCD panel. The Pixel 4a 5G also utilizes an LCD, but benefits from Google’s image processing, likely resulting in more accurate color reproduction. The real difference lies in the processing power driving the display; the Snapdragon 765G will handle UI animations and video playback more smoothly than the Helio G25.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 4a 5G’s camera system is a major advantage. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess elevates image quality significantly. The Snapdragon 765G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is far more capable than the one found in the Helio G25, enabling features like Night Sight and improved HDR processing. The Moto E7 likely relies heavily on software enhancements to compensate for its less powerful hardware, but will struggle to match the Pixel’s dynamic range and detail in challenging lighting conditions. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on both, the Pixel's main sensor and processing will deliver superior results.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Motorola Moto E7’s Mediatek Helio G25, built on a 12nm process, features a split-core CPU configuration (2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53). This is geared towards efficiency, but struggles with demanding tasks. Conversely, the Google Pixel 4a 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) employs a tri-cluster architecture (Kryo 475 Prime, Gold, and Silver) offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The 7nm process also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly prefer the Pixel 4a 5G.
Battery Life
The Moto E7’s focus on affordability likely means a larger battery capacity, though specific numbers are unavailable. However, the Pixel 4a 5G’s more efficient Snapdragon 765G chipset and optimized software will likely result in comparable, if not better, real-world battery life. Furthermore, the Pixel 4a 5G supports 18W wired charging with PD2.0, offering significantly faster charging speeds than the Moto E7’s 10W charging. This means less time tethered to an outlet.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto E7 if you need a highly affordable smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and battery life is your top priority. Buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G if you prefer a faster processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, a superior camera system for capturing high-quality photos and videos, and the benefits of 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.