The Motorola Moto E6 and Samsung Galaxy A10e represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting first-time buyers or those seeking a reliable secondary device. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an incredibly affordable price point, but significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate which phone offers the better experience. This comparison will dissect those differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A10e emerges as the better choice. Its Exynos 7884 chipset, built on a smaller 14nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Moto E6’s Snapdragon 435, making it more capable for everyday tasks and light multitasking. While battery life is comparable, the A10e’s slightly more refined software experience seals the deal.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 - AT&T |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - Verizon | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Metro PCS, T-Mobile |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, August | 2019, July. Released 2019, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 149.7 x 72.3 x 8.6 mm (5.89 x 2.85 x 0.34 in) | 147.3 x 69.6 x 8.4 mm (5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 159 g (5.61 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~296 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 76.5 cm2 (~70.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.83 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM435 Snapdragon 435 (28 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 8 MP, f/1.9, AF
or
5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.0
or
2 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct or Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Navy Blue | Black |
| Models | XT2005-3, XT2005-1, XT2005DL | SM-A102U, SM-S102DL, SM-A102U1, SM-A102W, SM-A102N |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | 0.47 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E6
- Extremely affordable price point
- Compact and pocketable design
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Significantly slower performance
- Outdated 28nm manufacturing process
- Basic camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A10e
- More powerful Exynos 7884 chipset
- Larger display for better media consumption
- More responsive user experience
- Slightly higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Still limited camera performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, though specific details like resolution and brightness are not provided. However, the A10e’s larger screen size (typically 6.3 inches vs the E6’s 5.7 inches) offers a more immersive viewing experience. The lack of information on PWM dimming rates prevents a definitive statement on eye strain, but generally, Samsung displays tend to have higher PWM frequencies. The E6’s smaller size may appeal to users preferring a more compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices is expected to be basic. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make precise comparisons. However, the A10e likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more pleasing results in good lighting conditions. The presence of a dedicated night mode (often found on A-series Samsung phones) would further differentiate it. The common inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical benefit. Focusing on the main sensor’s quality is crucial, and the A10e likely has a slight edge due to its more capable chipset enabling better image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A10e’s Exynos 7884, fabricated on a 14nm process, is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Motorola Moto E6’s Snapdragon 435 (28nm). The A10e’s CPU configuration – a combination of two 1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and six 1.35 GHz Cortex-A53 cores – provides a substantial boost in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the E6’s eight 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience. The 14nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load. While neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, the A10e will handle casual games more comfortably.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range, typical for this price segment. The Snapdragon 435 in the Moto E6 is known for its relatively good power efficiency, potentially offsetting the A10e’s more powerful (and therefore potentially more power-hungry) Exynos 7884. Charging speeds are likely similar – slow, using standard micro-USB charging. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but both phones should comfortably last a full day with moderate use. The A10e’s more efficient software optimizations could provide a slight advantage in standby time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto E6 if you prioritize extreme affordability and a very basic, uncluttered Android experience – potentially benefitting from Android Go edition optimizations. It’s ideal for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and very light app usage. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A10e if you prefer a more responsive user experience, slightly better multitasking capabilities, and a more recognizable brand ecosystem. It’s a better fit for those who occasionally browse the web, use social media, or play casual games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7884 in the Galaxy A10e overheat during prolonged use, like gaming?
While not a gaming powerhouse, the Exynos 7884’s 14nm process is more efficient than the Snapdragon 435’s 28nm process. This means it’s less prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions or multitasking. You might experience some throttling, but it’s unlikely to be severe enough to render the phone unusable.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, no. 2MP macro cameras on budget phones typically lack the resolution and optics to produce truly detailed close-up shots. They are often included as a marketing feature but deliver underwhelming results. You’re better off using the main camera and cropping the image.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A10e handle popular games like PUBG Mobile, and if so, at what settings?
The Galaxy A10e can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll need to lower the graphics settings to the lowest possible levels (Smooth graphics, Low frame rate) to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect some stuttering and lag, especially during intense firefights. It’s not ideal for competitive gaming, but it’s sufficient for casual play.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto E6 benefit from any Android Go optimizations, and if so, how does that affect performance?
The Moto E6 is eligible for Android Go edition, which is a lightweight version of Android designed for devices with limited RAM and storage. This can improve performance by reducing bloatware and optimizing apps for lower-end hardware. However, the Snapdragon 435 is still a limiting factor, so the benefits of Android Go are somewhat constrained.
