The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Motorola Moto E40 and the Samsung Galaxy A14. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful processor, better camera capabilities, and faster charging. While the Moto E40 offers a more affordable entry point, the A14 provides a noticeably superior overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 40, 66 - Brazil | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 07 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 11 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.1 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.5 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Gray, Pink Clay | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 90 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E40
- More powerful processor
- Better camera system
- Faster charging (15W)
- Larger and higher resolution display
- More RAM options available
- Slightly more expensive
- Samsung's One UI can be divisive
Samsung Galaxy A14
- More affordable
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Weaker processor
- Lower resolution display
- Slower charging (10W)
- Less versatile camera
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically features a larger display (around 6.6 inches) with a higher resolution (FHD+) compared to the Moto E40 (around 6.5 inches, HD+). This results in a sharper and more immersive viewing experience on the A14. Both phones likely use LCD panels, so don't expect OLED-level color accuracy or contrast.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 generally boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a higher-resolution main sensor and additional lenses (ultrawide, macro). While the Moto E40 has a decent camera for its price range, the A14's image processing and overall camera quality are noticeably better, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
Here's where the Galaxy A14 truly shines. The Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) chipset offers a substantial performance boost over the Unisoc T700 in the Moto E40. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A14. The A14's CPU architecture is also more efficient.
Battery Life
Both phones offer large batteries (typically 5000mAh), providing all-day battery life. However, the Galaxy A14's more efficient processor and 15W fast charging give it a slight edge in terms of overall battery performance and charging speed compared to the Moto E40's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E40 is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize affordability and a clean Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better choice for those seeking improved performance, a more versatile camera system, and a longer-lasting battery, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A14's Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Moto E40's Unisoc T700.
❓ Is the Moto E40 worth buying if I'm on a very tight budget?
Yes, the Moto E40 remains a viable option for those seeking an extremely affordable smartphone with a clean Android experience. However, be prepared for compromises in performance and camera quality.
