The Motorola Moto E32s and Xiaomi Redmi 10A represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core specifications to determine which device offers the best balance of performance and features for everyday users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto E32s emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G37 chipset, with higher CPU clock speeds, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Redmi 10A’s Helio G25, making it more responsive for daily tasks and light gaming. While the Redmi 10A is cheaper, the E32s’ faster charging and marginally better performance justify the small price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, AF |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Slate Gray, Misty Silver | Charcoal Black, Sea Blue, Slate Grey |
| Models | - | 220233L2C, 220233L2G, 220233L2I |
| Price | About 80 EUR | € 60.00 / $ 66.55 |
| SAR | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E32s
- Faster CPU performance with Helio G37
- Faster 15W charging
- Potentially smoother multitasking
- May be slightly more expensive than Redmi 10A
- Camera performance likely similar to Redmi 10A
Xiaomi Redmi 10A
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (estimated 4000-5000 mAh)
- Reliable brand reputation
- Slower CPU performance with Helio G25
- Slower 10W charging
- Less responsive user experience
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, but the focus here is on performance. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing cost reduction over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones relying on basic image sensors. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both manufacturers often include low-resolution auxiliary cameras (e.g., 2MP depth sensors) that offer minimal practical benefit. Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, with Xiaomi’s software often leaning towards more saturated colors, while Motorola aims for a more natural look. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Moto E32s features the Mediatek Helio G37, built on a 12nm process, with an octa-core CPU configuration peaking at 2.3 GHz. The Redmi 10A uses the Helio G25, also 12nm, but with a lower peak CPU speed of 2.0 GHz. This 300MHz difference, coupled with the G37’s potentially more efficient Cortex-A53 implementation, translates to a tangible performance advantage for the Moto E32s in CPU-intensive tasks. While both use the same ARM Cortex-A53 cores, the higher clock speeds on the E32s will result in faster processing. The G37 also benefits from a slightly more capable GPU, offering a better, though still limited, gaming experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Moto E32s has a clear advantage in charging speed, supporting 15W wired charging compared to the Redmi 10A’s 10W. This means the E32s will reach a full charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. While a larger battery capacity *could* offset slower charging, the 5W difference in charging wattage is substantial enough to favor the Moto E32s for users who value convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto E32s if you prioritize a smoother user experience and faster charging. It’s ideal for users who frequently switch between apps, browse the web, or enjoy casual mobile gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10A if your primary concern is absolute affordability and you primarily need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a solid option for first-time smartphone owners or those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Moto E32s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Helio G37 is capable of running these games, expect to play them at low to medium settings to maintain a playable frame rate. The GPU isn't powerful enough for high settings, and prolonged gaming may lead to some thermal throttling. The Redmi 10A will struggle even more with these titles.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Moto E32s compared to the Redmi 10A in real-world use?
The 15W charging on the Moto E32s will likely shave off around 30-60 minutes of charging time compared to the Redmi 10A’s 10W charging, assuming both start from 0%. This difference is significant for users who need to quickly top up their phone throughout the day.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Helio G37 and Helio G25 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Moto E32s will feel snappier when opening apps, switching between them, and browsing the web. The Redmi 10A may exhibit slight lag or delays in these scenarios, especially with multiple apps open.
