The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Motorola Moto E32s and the Samsung Galaxy A14. But which one delivers the best experience for your hard-earned cash? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 generally edges out the Moto E32s thanks to its more powerful chipset (especially the Exynos version), potentially better camera performance, and Samsung's software support. However, the Moto E32s might offer a slightly more refined design and potentially a better display depending on individual preferences.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Slate Gray, Misty Silver | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 80 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E32s
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially more compact design
- Decent display
- Competitive price
- Less powerful chipset
- Camera performance lags behind A14
- Slower software updates
Samsung Galaxy A14
- More powerful chipset (especially Exynos version)
- Better camera system
- Larger display
- Samsung's One UI and software support
- Potentially better battery life
- One UI can be bloated for some
- 15W charging is slow
- Design may be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Galaxy A14 typically boasts a slightly larger screen size and potentially better color accuracy. The Moto E32s might have a slightly more vibrant display, but this can vary. Resolution is generally FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 generally offers a more versatile camera system with a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. While the Moto E32s has a decent camera, the A14's software and hardware typically result in better photos, especially in low light. Both offer decent selfie cameras.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A14, particularly the Exynos 850 version, holds a significant advantage in performance. The Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) offers noticeably faster processing speeds and better multitasking capabilities compared to the Moto E32s' Helio G37. Gaming performance will also be superior on the A14.
Battery Life
Both phones offer similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), but the Galaxy A14's more efficient chipset (especially the Exynos version) could translate to slightly better battery life in real-world usage. Charging speeds are identical at 15W.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E32s is a good choice for users prioritizing a clean Android experience, a potentially more compact design, and a slightly lower price point. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is ideal for those seeking a more powerful processor, a larger display, and the benefits of Samsung's One UI and longer software update commitment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A14, particularly the Exynos 850 version, offers significantly better gaming performance due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ How long will Samsung provide software updates for the Galaxy A14?
Samsung typically provides longer software update support for its Galaxy A series devices, often offering 4 years of security updates and 2 years of OS upgrades.
❓ Is the Moto E32s worth considering if I prefer a clean Android experience?
Yes, the Moto E32s is a good option if you value a near-stock Android experience and don't require top-tier performance. It offers a smooth and uncluttered user interface.
